And will make mistakes. And therefore, you write your programs so that catastrophes don't occur when those mistakes are made.
就是人是很愚蠢的,会犯错误的,因此,你要这样设计你的程序,以达到当犯错误时避免大事故的目的。
So, if you want to attack urban air quality, this is probably moving in the wrong direction, OK?
所以如果你想攻击都市的空气质量,这可能是一个错误的方向,对吗?
Well it happened because we clearly must have a faulty assumption This can't possibly be true.
是因为做了,一个错误的,这不可能是真的。
So that would, this is actually a very common mistake and it makes sense if you think about it.
这的确是一个非常普遍的错误,如果你想想,这个是言之有理的。
Milton is alluding so unashamedly here to Spenser's Errour because, I think, on some level he wants to brand Spenserian allegory as an erroneous literary practice.
弥尔顿是如此厚颜无耻地引用斯潘塞的“错误“因为,在某种程度上他想标榜斯潘塞的寓言,是文学上的一个错误尝试。
f truth is the recognition of the systematic character of a certain kind of error, then it would be fully dependent on the prior existence of this error.
如果真理是,对一种错误的系统化字符的认可,那么它会完全依赖于这个错误的先前存在。
I think it's fair to say that right now just about everybody agrees all of these three claims are mistaken.
我想,现在几乎所有人都会一致认为,这三条主张是错误的。
No. That's completely the wrong way to go about thinking what it's like to be a ball point pen.
并不是,这样想象圆珠笔的感觉,是完全错误的。
0 So on a scale of 1 to 10, how big a mistake was it that they let Lehman go?
那么假定从1到,让雷曼兄弟破产的决定是多大的错误?
These anachronisms and confused chronologies in the patriarchal stories are the rule rather than the exception in their view, and they are evidence of a very late date of composition.
在他们看来,这些年代错误和混乱的时间线,在族长故事中是普遍现象而不是例外,明显是十分近代的作品。
I've learned that with high probability, the error is not in the first part of the program.
我从这一点得到了什么?,我得到的是错误有很大的可能。
What will make a difference to our levels of wellbeing is if we have right vs. wrong expectations.
能影响幸福水平的,是我们的期望是正确还是错误。
It's thought that that is a serious error because it destroys trust in the currency.
这被认为是一个严重的错误,因为它会摧毁人们对货币的信任程度。
This is totally wrong, this is the wrong picture altogether.
这是完全错误的,这整个图像都是错误的。
That's all about a wrong god anyway. It's about a false god.
它说的是一个错误的,虚假的上帝。
And why would it be wrong? That what I want to hear.
为什么是错误的,我想听听理由。
Otherwise, you've got to convince me that they're not true.
除非你们能给我指出哪些矛盾是错误的
So the flaw in the argument that Chris and Ryan had -- it isn't a bad argument, it's a good starting point but the flaw in the argument, the mistake in the argument was the first sentence in the argument.
所以克里斯和瑞恩的说法的漏洞在于,这并不是一个错误的说法,这是一个很好的出发点,但其中存在漏洞,其中的漏洞在于第一句话
There's this notion of a Boolean value named after Mr. Bool, which is just a notion of true or false.
布尔值的概念是在布尔先生之后命名的,它是一个正确或错误的概念。
That's the fundamental mistake, as they see it, that their enemies of various kinds make in their understanding, in their approach to literature.
这是他们的根本错误,在他们看来,他们,敌人,干涉对文学的理解。
That sort of thing. Makes a big difference to just get that set of eyes.
都是这样的错误,借旁观者的慧眼会对你有很大的帮助。
This is a sort of stripped-down version without all the fanciness but it tests exactly the same thing.
这是个没有花俏的简体版,但也同样是在检测错误信念
It's almost as if we can hear Milton say, after he's given his own really quite elaborate display of allegorical poetry, "Thus Spenser relates, erring."
我们几乎可以听见弥尔顿在他,展示自己已经完备的寓言诗之后说,“因此关于斯潘塞的,都是错误“
So the personality theory,follow the personality, is wrong if we say neither of these guys is Napoleon.
所以人格理论所遵循的人格特性,是错误的,如果我们说两者都不是拿破仑。
So, even though the lines were wrong, he says, no, that is hydrogen.
所以,即使那光线是错误的,他说,不,它就是氢。
It's a mistake to try to consider finance in isolation.
把金融学看作一门孤立的学科是错误的
That's wrong expectation.
那是错误的期望。
It goes without saying that these are questions that it's impossible for us to try to answer certainly now, but Milton lets us know later in Paradise Lost that Satan was wrong to embark on his dangerous deconstruction of divine power.
毫无疑问,这些问题,我们现在无法给出确切回答,但弥尔顿后来在《失乐园》中告诉我们,撒旦,想要毁灭神权力量的危险行动是错误的。
So my answer is always going to be zero and therefore almost always going to be wrong. Yeah?
所以我的答案总会是,因此,几乎这总是错误的,对不?
So things break if you try-- if the computer tries to take you too literally so it would not be correct generally to do something like that.
如果你把它分开-,那么电脑会逐字逐句地解析,你拆开写的代码,由此得到的结果一般都是错误的。
应用推荐