It requires the citizens are informed, not just informed, well-informed enough to know whether they are being adequately served.
公民需要了解,不仅仅是了解,要很好地了解他们是否,得到了政府的良好服务。
So the criterion is: is it relevant to the unified form that we as critics are trying to realize in the text?
所以,这里的标准是:,隐含的意义是否和文本的一致性有关,而这正是我们作为文学批评家,要通过文本实现的?
I'm now exploring the question of whether or not stock prices are indeed memoryless, or the stock changes.
我现在要探索一个问题那就是股价,是否真的是无记忆的,或者说股票的变化是否是无记忆性的。
And so as a way of understanding what at this point is really the sheer repetitiveness of this disclaimer, I want to propose a metaphor.
因此为了理解这个论点是否真的,是这种放弃的纯粹的重复,我将会提出一个隐喻。
If the soul is immaterial, doesn't it follow automatically, trivially, that the soul can't be destroyed by a material process?
如果灵魂是无形的,是否可以顺理成章地得出,灵魂无法被实体过程所摧毁呢
one of the big causes of companies not filing financial statements on time was if they had backdated the stock options.
公司是否按时发布财务报表的,一个很重要的原因,是他们是否有追溯期权。
So what we need to examine now is whether John Stuart Mill had a convincing reply to these objections to utilitarianism.
我们现在的任务是思考穆勒,是否令人信服地回应了对功利主义的质疑。
The administration of justice,which means deciding what is just, is the regulation of the partnership which is the polis.
司法机构,即决定是否公正的地方,是调整人与人关系的机构,即城邦
And at the end of the day the ultimate test is whether you're able to get done what you want to get done, or what you think the market demands from you.
每天最后的测试是看你是否,能够做成自己想做的,或者你认为市场会对你要求什么。
What we don't get here is a sense of whether there really is an alternate secret postal system that serves a sort of underground of private networks.
在这里我们所不明白的是,是否真的存在一个,提供地下的,私密的通信服务的,秘密邮政系统。
So all has been given. It's simply Israel's choice to take it or not.
那么,一切都被陈明了这仅仅是以色列人是否接受它的问题。
Is there a kind of good that we delight in for its own sake?
是否有一种好处是我们,因为它而感到喜乐?
If we learn from these experiences in ourselves, the question is no longer whether or not it's possible to experience it more and more in our lives.
如果我们自己吸取这些经验,那么问题就不再是,是否有可能,越来越多地体验它。
All right, so it might be that again, the problem with enforcement, although actually in 1880 America, it's not clear that they couldn't have enforced that contract.
好的,但是我刚才说了强制性的问题,虽然说那是1880年的美国,当时这种合同是否违法没有明确的界定
It'll say is this really what you ate, and if you ate it, then you say yes I ate this, and then it adds to the electronic log.
系统会问这是否确实是你吃的,如果确实是 就选择是,你的选择会被记入电子日志
And one of the things one may immediately detect is whether or not the person who wrote the poem was indeed writing the poem and thought that she or he was in command, right?
一个人在阅读时很快就能发现,写这首诗的作者是否,真的是在独立作诗,认为自己对文字完全具有掌控权?
Whatever the proposal is on by anybody, Obama, Clinton or McCain I think it should be consistent And so the question is that ? should you make the tax cuts permanent?
任何提案,不管是谁制定的,奥巴马也好,克林顿或者麦凯恩也罢,我认为都应当坚持实施下去,明确了这一点,那么现在的问题是,减税政策到底是否应该长期实施?
And fixed versus variable speaks to whether you give a reward on a fixed schedule, every fifth time, or variable, sometimes on the third time, sometimes on the seventh time, and so on.
固定与变化则是相对于,你是否根据固定时程给予奖励而言的,每五次就给予奖励,或者是变化的,有时候在第三次上给予奖励,有时候则在第七次上给予奖励。
And so, he has put this chemistry to use in this robotic arm and they call it Fido, because often dogs are the creatures that have to go out and detect these things, and it's not a great job if you're a dog to be sent out to see whether there was an explosive and discover yes, there was, a little bit too late.
因为通常都是派狗去检查这些东西,这个不是个好工作,如果你是一只狗,被派去检查是否有爆炸物,然后你发现有,那就来不及了,所以用机器手检查化学物质。
it's looking first to see am I in the base case, which I'm done. If I'm not I'm just going to reduce this to a smaller computation.
注意这个计算是干什么的,它先判断我是否属于基础事件,这个我已经做过了。
What I'm considering right now is the question whether sameness of soul is the key to being the same person.
我现在考虑的问题是,同样的灵魂,是否就是成为同一个人的关键。
The first question we want to discuss has to do with the possibility of my surviving my death.
我们要讨论的第一个问题是,我是否可能幸免一死
It comes from personal experience that raises a question at least about whether all values can be translated without loss into utilitarian terms.
是亲身见闻所引起的疑问,是否所有的价值都可以完好无损地,转换为功利主义的形式。
Again, our question was, "Do we need to appeal to souls to explain something about us?"
我们的问题是,我们是否需要诉诸灵魂来解释我们自己
And so the question's got to be not only, is the soul distinct?
那么问题将变成不仅仅是,灵魂是否独立于肉体
When we look at the death of Socrates, do we think of it as a tragedy, as a moral tragedy, ? a just man sentenced to death by an unjust law?
当我们读到苏格拉底之死,我们是否会认为那是一场悲剧,道德悲剧,一名正义之士被不公的法律判处死刑?
But the point to think about for next time is just, is it really true that all three of the premises are true, or might one or more of them be false?
但下次要思考的关键是,那三个前提是否的确全部为真,或许一个或几个为假呢
It's an interesting question as to whether he really explains how a child goes from a concrete thinker to an abstract thinker, or how he goes from not having object permanence to understanding object permanence.
问题是,他是否真的解释了,儿童思维是如何从具体向抽象转变的,或是真的解释了,儿童的客体永存性概念是如何从无到有的
Is that true of all of us?
对我们来说是否都是这样的呢?
I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think even with consent, even with a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker, at the very last moment, it would still be wrong.
我现在想听听,是否有人认为,即便是征得了同意,即便是有了抽签,即便派克最终还是答应了,杀死派克依然还是错误的。
应用推荐