In fact this treatise is often described, or maybe even most commonly described, as the Western tradition's greatest argument against censorship.
事实上,这本著作常常被描述为,或是可能广泛地被认为,是英国传统上最伟大的与控制相对立的文章。
I actually wrote an article, it was called, it was on the Lehman Brothers
我原先写过一篇文章,标题叫……是关于雷曼兄弟的,
The two passages that I'm about to read juxtapose the viewpoints that I've been trying to evoke in describing Gadamer's position.
我要读的这两篇文章在某些观点上是并行的,我在讲伽达默尔的看法时想激发的就是这些观点。
I don't actually know whether it's deserved or not, because Yale does not publish information about what the grading averages are.
我不知道这名声是不是我应得的,因为耶鲁并没有对什么是普通的评分标准,发表文章。
Obviously, there's something going on in this text that has produced this confusion, or we could think of it as a misreading.
显然,这文章中有些东西,让人产生疑惑,或者是我们可以将它视为是误解。
Modigliani and Miller wrote a famous article arguing that-- what I just said--I just tried to say it in very intuitive terms.
莫迪利阿尼和米勒有一篇非常著名的文章是讲...,刚提过的,我想用直观的词汇来描述
So remember last time I put up the article by the Crimson that was unfortunately I couldn't find ? a more recent one-- that was 2004?
记得上次,我提出的《哈佛克里姆森》杂志里的文章,很可惜我找不到,更近期一点的,那是2004年的?
And stimulus generalization is the topic of one of your articles in The Norton Reader, the one by Watson, John Watson, the famous behaviorist, who reported a bizarre experiment with a baby known as Little Albert.
刺激泛化是,《诺顿读本》中一篇文章的主题,作者为约翰·华生,著名的行为主义者,他记述了一项奇怪的实验,对象则是一名叫做小阿尔伯特的婴儿。
Now, there are two things that she is left with, in the passage I just read: that sense of San Narciso being all of America, and, moreover, of it being constituted of "storm systems of group suffering and need."
在我刚刚读过的文章中,她留下了两件事:,一是圣弗朗西斯科:,就是整个美国的感觉,二是它作为,“人们承受而,又需要的风暴系统“的一部分“
In this case, this is one of the articles, in fact this was today's reading, I got here a little early so it was this particular article was assigned for today and-- but what shows up when you click on the initial tab is just the abstract of the article not the whole article itself.
例如这是其中一篇,实际上这是今天的资料,我今天到的比较早,所以把它放了上去,这是今天布置的文章,但当你们点击初始的按键时,只能看到文章的摘要而不是全文
This is the best introductory text to ? the study of Political Philosophy. Why?
是研习政治哲学,最佳的入门文章,为何?
This is beautiful writing.
这是一篇漂亮的文章。
And what he could show was that it could be expressed, this is a picture from his 1994 science paper, in that e coli, and it is going to fluoresce green.
他证明了它可以被表达,这是1994年science文章里的一张图,在这大肠杆菌里,它有绿色的萤光。
It's a huge book which is all about this short story by Balzac, "Sarrasine," that he begins this essay by quoting.
这本大部头的书都是在讲巴尔扎克的短篇小说《沙拉辛》的,在文章开头他引用道。
Now the first passage is in Gadamer's text on page 735, the very bottom of the page, and then I'll be going over to page 736.
现在我们要看的第一篇文章是伽达默尔写的,在第735页最下面,一直到736页。
It's in that context, needless to say, that I'd like to take a look at these two interesting passages on the sheet that has Anton Chekhov on one side and Henry James on the other.
不用说这节课,我将会谈到纸上列出的这两篇有趣的文章,一篇是契诃夫的而另一篇是亨利,詹姆斯的。
One of the most remarkable things about this text is that it's invariably the soaring, libertarian rhetoric that we end up noting, that we end up remembering, and that sticks with us.
这文章中最值得注意的一点是,这不断激增的翱翔的自由的修辞,让我们,最终注意到最终记住,最终永不会忘记。
It's reasonable, I think, to invoke Dr. Johnson here, Samuel Johnson, who writes in his Life of Milton that Milton's unskillful allegory appears to be one of the greatest faults of the poem.
我认为在这引用塞缪尔·约翰逊的话是很合理的,他一生都在写关于弥尔顿的文章,他指出弥尔顿不熟练的寓言成为了这部诗的大败笔之一。
In other words, here is a moment when Levi-Strauss is admitting something about his own work which he is not admitting in his analysis of the Oedipus myth in the essay from Structural Anthropology that you read last time.
换句话说,在这里,列维承认了,关于自己作品的一些观点,而这些观点,是他在《结构人类学》中的那篇文章中,分析俄狄浦斯神话时所没有承认的,大家上次读过那篇文章。
Forward rates I wrote a survey article years ago about the term structure of interest rates and I wanted to find out who was the originator of the term "forward rate."
远期利率,很多年前我写过一篇,研究利率期限结构的文章,我想知道谁是"远期利率"这个词的创始人
The essay that you read in its entirety for today, "Structure, Sign and Play in the Language of the Human Sciences," was delivered on the occasion of a conference about "the sciences of man" at Johns Hopkins University in 1966.
今天我们要读的是一整篇文章,名为《人文科学话语中的结构、符号和游戏》,这篇文章发表于1966年,在约翰普金斯大学召开的一个会议上,会议主题是“人类科学“
He's come to the conclusion that over 90% of the variability of returns in institutional portfolios is attributable to asset allocation and that's the number that I think most people hear cited when they are looking at Roger Ibbotson's work.
他得出结论,机构投资中,超过90%的回报率变动,要归因于资产配置,我想这是罗格·伊博森的文章里面,被人引用得最多的结论
It does so by insisting on a complex mode of ambiguity that governs the passage--not atmosphere.
这篇文章很朦胧,很复杂,算不上是一种气氛。
But the roles are reversed in the following passage, and this is where the text blows hot and cold.
但是在接下来的文章中角色互调了,这是文中描述冷热无常的情景。
He's a better teacher than Scotus or Aquinas, and the text seems almost to suggest that Milton can't do without his own teacher, Edmund Spenser.
他是一位比苏格拉底和阿奎那更好的良师,这些文章几乎暗示了弥尔顿,没有老师埃蒙德·斯潘塞则不能做到弃绝那些诱惑。
Now the added sugar before, does anybody remember from the Eaton article how ancient humans added sugar to things?
在糖类出现以前,有谁还记得伊顿的一篇文章是谈论,祖先是如何在食品中添加糖类
I guess it struck the author of that article that Redleaf is just a guy who was very curious about a lot of things.
我认为打动这篇文章作者的是,莱德利夫是一个,对很多事都抱有好奇心的人
I should mention that the very first reading that you're going to be doing is a couple of pages from Jay Rosenberg, a contemporary philosopher.
我想说你们首先,要阅读的是,杰·罗森伯格所写的文章,一个当代哲学家
What it means is that in understanding a text, we are attempting to grasp it in paraphrase.
它是说,在理解文章时,我们在试着给它释义,并掌握它。
应用推荐