And the 0.0016 is greater than what I would have as experimental error, so your theory is wrong. Bohr says oh, yeah?

。0016比,我检测出来的错误大得多，所以你的理论是错的，波尔说，哦，是吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Freud's mistake, and it's--although I'm picking on Freud, it's not only Freud that runs this sort of argument.

弗洛伊德是错的，虽然我选择他做例子，不仅是弗洛伊德一个人持有这种论点。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I know I'm doing something grossly--" and here is a very bad word "--wrong. I can still go ahead and do it."

我知道我的所作所为是很…”,注意他用的那个词了,“错的，但我还是能下得了手”

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So, assuming -- if anyone got it wrong because of that, that's my apologies, that's my fault.

如果有人是因为这个原因做错了，那我非常抱歉，这是我的错。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

I can't count correctly, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, is he actually the center guy here?

我可能数错了,123456,他是这行最中间的那个人吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

I think those together really know your own limitations as a fallible mortal and then exercise moderation because you are not divine, you are mortal.

我认为这两句话的真谛是,凡人皆会有错,所以要了解自身的局限性,既然你是人不是神,那么就要适可而止,不要走极端

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

I don't think he's wrong but I think murder is murder in any case.

我不认为他是错的,但谋杀就是谋杀，不管任何情况。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Whatever virtue of my writing might have it will be, because of values, those individual perceptions Sometimes I'm wrong, sometimes I'm right, but they are my perceptions.

不管我的写作可能有什么优点,由于价值观，及个人的观念,有时候我错了，有时候我对了，但那些都是我的观念。

麻省理工公开课 - 电影哲学课程节选

Which is sort of the question we'd immediately like to ask. Instead, I asked why did it produce the result it did. So I'm not asking myself what's wrong? Or how could I make it right?

其实这个问题我们马上就要问,我问了为什么它会返回这样的结果,因此我并没有去在意哪儿错了,或者我该怎么改正它，我在意的是它？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Don't you-- it's my fault, not yours.

不要,是我的错,不是你的

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

F-O-O in lowercase and, in fact, foo it is buggy because I typed lowercase F-O-O and FOO yet I get back capital F-O-O as both the original and the copy and that's simply because I haven't done this correctly.

小写的f-o-o，实际上，它是有bug的，因为我输入小写的,而我得到的原始的和拷贝的都是大写的,简单说，我处理错了。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Conversely, if you get an answer and it doesn't seem to make sense, then you've got to go back and ask, am I violating some of the assumptions, and here you will find the assumption that the particle had that acceleration a is true as long it's freely falling under gravity but not when you hit the ground.

反过来说,如果你得到一个结果,发现似乎是错的,那么你就应该回过头来问问自己,我是不是违反某些前提了,这个模型中,你就发现,只要质点在重力作用下自由下落,质点具有加速度a的前提是正确的,但是落地后就不成立了

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

If I would point at that tower and say, "I built that." I've been saying something false.

如果我指着那座塔说，“那是我搭的“，那我就错了。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, that all sounds very nice, but I think that claim has got to just be mistaken.

那都听起来非常不错，但我认为那种观点肯定是错的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

As I say, the common picture is pretty much mistaken from start to end.

就像我说的，那个普遍观点从头到尾都是错的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I'm sorry, half the monopoly quantity and that would produce this much each.

我说错了,是垄断产量的一半,这样双方都按照这样的协议生产

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

Okay, then he's wrong. I'm right.

好吧，他是错的，我才是正确的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But for all that, despite the popularity of that view, I'm inclined to think it must be wrong.

虽然观点受到追捧，我倾向认为它一定是错的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And of course, if that's true, then premise three is false.

当然了,如果我听说的是真的,那前提三就是错的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So the best response for Player 1, as a function of what Player 2 chooses, q2, is just equal to the q1 hat in this expression and if I solve that out carefully, I will no doubt make a mistake, but let's try it.

这个就是参与人1的最佳对策,它是参与人2策略q2的一个函数,它和之前的q1帽那个表达式是相等的,虽然我是很仔细地计算的,还是有可能算错的,我来验证一下

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

How would we go about, I mean I don't want to do it because I'll probably get it wrong, but if I wanted to solve out for this X and the Y, since this is a QR class, let's just talk about it a second.

我们怎么解呢,我的意思是我现在不会去计算,因为我可能会算错,但是如果你真的很想解出X和Y的值,介于这是一节需要快速反应的课,那我们花些时间来探讨一下吧

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

And if it is,all I can say is, again,it just seems to be false.

即便是这样，我还是能说，这看上去还是错的。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选