So, if you want to attack urban air quality, this is probably moving in the wrong direction, OK?

所以如果你想攻击都市的空气质量，这可能是一个错误的方向，对吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?

对吧，那将会是一个完全不同的情况，难道不是吗，因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的，对吧？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And ironically you sense, when you read this that even though Cain intends this as a rhetorical question "Am I my brother's keeper?"--in fact, he's right on the money.

当读到这一段的时候，你能感觉到其中的讽刺意味,尽管该隐的回答是一个设问句,“难道我是他的看守吗？“，事实上，指钱的话，他说的是对的。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

Relative to the whole market, It's well known that over periods of multiple decades the market has a tendency to go up.

是和整个市场相关的对吗，我们都知道经过几十年的时间周期,市场会有上涨的倾向。

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

Now that already tells us what we know, which is that the efficiency is going to be something less than zero, right?

我们都知道这个，这结果就是说效率,是负的，对吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

So, that's another example of the difference between a vaccine that works, and a vaccination that works, right?

所以,这个例子讲的是研发疫苗和,研究疫苗接种的不同之处,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

For example, I might believe that it's equally likely that they choose Left and Right, is that right?

举个例子吧,我可能认为他选择,左和右的可能性是相同的,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

It turns out that 38% of this bank was owned by the German Government, so it was kind of their problem, right?

最终由德国政府,收购了这家银行38%的股份,所以说这是政府的问题,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Right, 'cause that means either I've been handed zero elements which mean there's really no work to be done or I've been handed one element which is a vacuous truth that it's sorted, right?

因为如果给出0个元素,那意味着不需要做任何事,如果给出1个元素，那显然,它是有序的，对吗？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

So cannibalism is morally objectionable as such so then, even on the scenario of waiting until someone died, still it would be objectionable.

这么说来食人在道德上是不能容忍的,即便是在这种只能坐以待毙的情况下，依然是不能容忍的，对吗。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

But, of course, the question we're going to have to ask ourselves is: Is it right?

但是 当然了,我们需要扪心自问的是,这种观念是对的吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I guess all the raisins in the world are produced near Fresno, isn't that right Curtis?

我认为世界上最好的葡萄干都是在,弗雷斯诺附近生产的,对吗,柯蒂斯

耶鲁公开课 - 古希腊历史简介课程节选

We know that this dimension is roughly one angstrom unit, right?

我们知道,它的尺寸大概是一埃，对吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

I mention this because such complications ? should alert the careful reader. Right?

我提到这个是因为这样的复杂度,是细心读者应要留神的地方，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

One of them goes this way: Okay? And the other.

一个是这样的,对吗,另外一个是这样

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

So this is the central idea of calculus, right?

这是微积分的核心思想,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

Small portions are bad, that's right. Yes?

小分量食物是不好的,也对,还有吗

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

It started here, didn't it?

是在这儿爆发的，对吗？

普林斯顿公开课 - 国际座谈会课程节选

That probability is a lot to higher than 3 percent, right?

是48的概率是多少，这个概率,比3%高的多，对吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

And the question is, so how many pigs does he have, and how many chickens does he have? Wow. What a deep problem, right? But you're going to see why we're going to use this in a second. So you know how to solve this, this is a fifth-grade problem, right?

为了避免歧义，这些猪和鸡都是健全的,现在问题是它到底有多少只猪和鸡呢？,多深刻的一个问题啊，对吗？,但是你将要看到的是,我们为什么要举这个例子,你知道如何解答这个问题？

麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

I'm just looking. Right? No, Heidegger says, this is a total illusion.

我只是在看，对吗？，不，海哥德尔说，这是不切合实际的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

That's something prior. That's genesis. That's a cause, right?

那是优先存在的，是起源，是原因，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So in formalist terms, that's the way we have to understand what, if we weren't formalists, we would suppose, as I say, to be a mnemotechnical device for the purpose of communicating something about the weather in Spain. Right?

形式主义者会这样理解，但如果我们不是形式主义者，我们就会认为这个重复单纯是为了,记住西班牙的天气，对吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

Isn't the distinction between friend and enemy ? based on a kind of knowledge, on a perception of ? who is your friend and who is your enemy?

朋友与敌人之间的差别,不是根据知识吗，或是你对,谁是朋友或敌人的看法？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Okay? Things are either holy or common.

对吗？事物要么是神圣的要么是普通的。

耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

The question we have to ask is,Is that true of everybody?

我们要问的是，这对每个人都是一样吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But is that right, this refusal to make qualitative distinctions?

但是不进行定性区分是对的吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

Okay. Now this gentleman out here is actually doing it different from what I am doing and what most of you are doing but you know what? He's doing it correctly.

这位先生,和我做的不太一样,甚至和在座各位做的不太一样,但你知道吗,他做的是对的

耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

And so that's a very different thing, right?

而这是完全不同的,对吗

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

So supposed that I give you 16 elements to sort, well, following the logic before, the running time involved in sorting 16 elements is gonna be twice the running time 16 of sorting 8 elements, left half and right half plus 16 - and again, a little sanity check, 16 means-- just the merge steps, right?

现在要对16个元素进行排序，根据之前的逻辑，对16个元素排序,要花的时间是对8个元素排序所花时间的,2倍，分别用于左半部分和右半部分，再加上6,这里16是-,做合并的步数，对吗？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选