And the Aristotelian view held for a long time, but eventually it started to crumble in the light of more data.
而亚里士多德的观点在很长时间里得到了认同,但最终还是崩溃了,在越来越多的数据面前。
I want to spend a little time suggesting and developing the way in which that defense could be undertaken.
下面我想花点时间,阐述一下这一观点。
As we might put it somewhat misleadingly, what is it for "two" people to really be the same single extended-through-time person?
对于“两个“人、,如何才是同一个贯穿时间的人,可能有一些误导的观点?
We're going to wrestle with his claims quite a bit during the course of the semester.
在这学期的课程中我们会有相当一部分,辩论他一些观点的时间。
The time-ins are about thinking about how can I take in the ideas and use them.
练习时间“是关于如何接受和利用一些观点。
But then also a little bit about your history, where you come from, some of your experiences which have helped you or informed your opinions on this very difficult issue that the entire world really is spending a lot of time trying to work on.
然后再谈谈你们各自的经历,你们从何而来,谈一些你们自己的经历,一些帮助过你们,或形成了你们,就这个复杂问题的观点,这个全世界都在投入大量时间试图解决的问题。
That's why it will be worth taking some time to ask ourselves what about Plato's objections then.
这就是为什么值得,花时间研究柏拉图提出的反对观点。
We should also notice that... I should also mention that there're other metaphysical views about what goes on when an object exists over time.
我们应该注意到。,当一个物体,它的存在是贯穿时间的,还存在其他的形而上观点。
On the one hand, we have the dualist view; that's the view that we spent a fair bit of time sketching last meeting.
我们探讨了两种观点 一种是二元论的观点,上堂课上我们用了很长的时间来介绍它
But for the most part, although I'll occasionally, periodically refer to the readings, I won't spend a lot of time talking about the views in the readings.
但是大部分时候,尽管我将会偶尔地,或定期地提及课外阅读,我却不会花很多时间谈论书中的观点。
Idealism is a position that's got a very long history in philosophy and for many classes would be worth taking a fair bit of time to consider more carefully.
唯心主义这个观点,在哲学史上占据了很长一段时间,并且值得我们花几节课,时间用心解读这个观点
I've been here helping myself to the suggestion that we should think about extension over time.
于是我借助这个观点,我们应该考虑,在时间里延展。
应用推荐