-
Like Homer and like Virgil, Milton intends to soar above the wheeling poles of the visible world and describe the otherwise invisible comings and goings of the gods.
像荷马和维吉尔那样，弥尔顿想屹立于现实世界之上,去描绘无形世界中上帝的来来往往。
-
If the soul is immaterial, doesn't it follow automatically, trivially, that the soul can't be destroyed by a material process?
如果灵魂是无形的,是否可以顺理成章地得出,灵魂无法被实体过程所摧毁呢
-
It's because the investment in the bodily world is so great here that Milton ultimately turns to the Christian vision, the more familiar Christian vision, of a bodiless afterlife.
对有形世界投入了这么多之后,弥尔顿最终转向了基督教视角，他更加熟悉的关于无形的来生的基督教视角。
-
They only had the occasion in a kind of formless matter upon which they could adopt and impose any form they took.
他们仅有的是,在一种无形物质中的机遇,在其中他们能采纳,并强加任何他们喜欢的形式。
-
And dualism simply says, "It's all nonphysical, it's part of the ether," and hence fails to explain it.
二元论只是说,"心灵是无形的,是世界的一部分",因此并不能给出合理的解释
-
So it's a seamless transition and experiments are done in context.
这就是一个无形的过渡,实验是在一定背景下完成的。
-
You don't get the more modest conclusion invisible things can't be destroyed or it's a whole lot harder to destroy them.
不是得出个更谦虚的结论,无形的东西不会毁灭或者,要毁灭它是不容易的。
-
And the way to tell it doesn't have parts is because it's invisible, because invisible things can't have parts.
辨别它是否有部分的方法,是因为它是无形的，因为无形的东西没有部分。
-
We have to ask, when we say invisible things can't be destroyed, what did we mean by invisible?
我们要问，当我们说无形的东西不可毁灭，我们所说的无形是什么意思？
-
So even though it's invisible, you can destroy it by destroying the musical instrument on which it depends.
所以即使它是无形的,你可以通过毁掉它所依靠的乐器,来毁灭它。
-
Simmias says we can't conclude that the soul is indestructible because we should not believe the subconclusion 4 invisible things can't be destroyed.
他说我们不能得出结论说,灵魂不朽或几乎不朽或其他什么,因为我们不该相信,4这个结论4,即无形的东西不可毁灭。
-
More specifically, dualists like Descartes struggle to explain how a physical body connects to an immaterial soul.
更进一步,像笛卡尔一样的二元论者努力想要解释,生理客体是如何与无形心灵相联系的
-
And then if 5 is true that the soul is really invisible, we are entitled to conclude 6 The soul can't be destroyed.
然后如果5正确,即灵魂确实无形，我们有资格得出6这个结论6,灵魂不会毁灭。
-
Doesn't it follow that a soul, an immaterial entity, can't be destroyed by a material, physical process?
而灵魂这种,无形的实体,是否会遵循这个规律被物质,也就是物理过程摧毁呢
-
He should have said that you know what, harmony is not really invisible or can't be destroyed.
他应该说，知道么，和声并不是真的无形,并不是不可毁灭。
-
Is the soul invisible in the way that the forms are, being indestructable, or is it invisible in the way that radio waves are, destructible.
灵魂的无形,是和形式的无形一样不可毁灭，还是和无线电波的无形一样,是可以毁灭的。
-
So maybe by invisible he should have moved to this stronger, bolder definition of invisible.
所以无形的含义他应该转移到了,这个更有力更大胆的定义上来。
-
But is it still invisible if by invisibility we mean can't be detected?
但是如果无形是指不能检测,灵魂还是不是无形呢？
-
So you are wrong, Socrates, when you say invisible things can't be destroyed.
所以苏格拉底你错了，无形的东西不可毁灭并不对。
-
So without getting hung up on, what is the English word invisible mean?
所以不要专注于，无形这个词是什么含义？
-
So 1, 2 and 3 got us 4 Invisible things can't be destroyed.
所以一二和三可以得出四4,无形的东西不会毁灭。
-
So, this is known as dualism because the claim is, for humans at least, there are two separate things; there's our material bodies and there's our immaterial minds.
这便是二元论,因为它主张,至少对于人类而言,存在两种独立的成分,即有形的生理客体与无形的心理
-
But if invisible things can't be destroyed, the soul can't be destroyed.
但如果无形的东西不会毁灭，那灵魂就不会毁灭。
-
Certainly most people in America believe in some sort of immaterial soul.
当然，在美国，大多数人,相信一些无形的灵魂。
-
He offers an example of a invisible thing that can be destroyed.
他给出了一个例子,证明无形的东西也可以毁灭。
-
He's talking about the difference between the visible and invisible things.
他谈到了有形和无形,的东西二者的区别。
-
Well, it was when by invisibility we meant can't be seen.
是的，如果说无形,是看不见的话。
-
And if it's not really invisible, even there is a notion of invisible such are the things that invisible in that sense can't be destroyed, souls are not invisible in that sense.
如果它不是完全无形的，即使有无形的定义,根据定义有些东西是无形的,无形的东西不可毁灭，但是灵魂在这个意义上不是无形的。
-
Still, others have you occupying an amorphous spirit world.
还有一些其他文化,你会去到某个无形的精神世界
-
Harmony is not invisible in the relevant sense, so it could still be true that invisible things can't be destroyed, since the soul is invisible in that sense, it would follow the soul can't be detroyed.
和声在这个意义上不是无形的，所以无形的东西不能毁灭,仍然可以是正确的，因为灵魂在这个意义上仍是无形的，你可以得出灵魂不能毁灭的结论。
应用推荐