-
Now this may suggest a certain condescension both toward theory and toward literary text, which is not at all intended.
选择这篇文章也许意味着,要对理论和文本进行一定的浓缩，这一点不是我想要的。
-
Now I want to contrast that with what we see from Nabokov in this essay, Good Readers and Good Writers.
现在我要把这和《好读者和好作者》这篇文章中,纳博科夫的观点做下比较。
-
He's a better teacher than Scotus or Aquinas, and the text seems almost to suggest that Milton can't do without his own teacher, Edmund Spenser.
他是一位比苏格拉底和阿奎那更好的良师，这些文章几乎暗示了弥尔顿,没有老师埃蒙德·斯潘塞则不能做到弃绝那些诱惑。
-
So, I went to the library and I looked up Advances in Molten Salt Chemistry volume six because there's an article in there about the chemistry and electrochemistry of magnesium production.
所以我去了趟图书馆，查阅了,第六版的《高级熔融态盐化学》,因为那里面有一篇关于生产镁的,化学和电化学的文章。
-
Let me just read two texts to that effect, first going back to Roland Barthes on page 877.
让我们读两篇和这个意思大致相同的文章，首先翻回877页罗兰，巴特的文章。
-
Modigliani and Miller wrote a famous article arguing that-- what I just said--I just tried to say it in very intuitive terms.
莫迪利阿尼和米勒有一篇非常著名的文章是讲...,刚提过的,我想用直观的词汇来描述
-
Think about that when you have your sections or when you talk about this text with your friends.
当你们在进行讨论时想一想这个问题,或是当你和友人谈论这段文章时。
-
The readings will be a mix between things that'll be quite easy for you to understand, things from the popular media, etc., and then some more sophisticated publications from scientific journals.
材料涵盖面很广,这样更有助于你们理解,比如一些大众读物,和一些比较艰深的学术期刊上的文章
-
This then leads to a very different discussion because A play is not a piece of text. A play is a living thing That is meant to be performed by actors in a particular setting. Different actors with different directors interpret the words of Shakespeare to the best. We can construct those words differently.
这引起一场很不同的讨论,因为一部戏剧不是一篇文章，而是活物,是要被演员在特定的场景下,表演出来的，不同的演员,和导演尽可能去诠释莎士比亚的文字,我们可以以不同方式建构这些文字。
-
Right, we see in this passage something that reveals so much about what the Greek values were and you'll see how closely they were tied up with the polis and the primacy of the polis in their lives.
对的,我们在这篇文章中,看到了很多揭示希腊人价值观的东西,你们能看到他们和城邦以及城邦在他们,生命中至高无上的地位之间有多么紧密相连
-
Why is it worth it to him to take that risk? What's he trying to teach us about narrative and about language that makes it worth this risk?
为什么这值得他承担如此风险呢，关于叙述文章,和让这些风险值得语言，巴斯到底想教会我们什么呢？
-
It's very helpful for me, as I address you, to think about what you're seeing in the text, and that helps me to think about what I want to say to you.
这对我很有用，正如我和你们说的，想一想你们在文章里看到了什么，那会帮助我思考要和你们说什么。
-
Nobody can possibly miss in reading Eikhenbaum's rhetorically rather bizarre essay his obsession with struggle, with the fight, and with doing battle.
读完艾肯鲍姆,那篇修辞古怪的文章后，没有人会注意不到他对斗争和挣扎的热衷。
-
This connects I think with a whole host of other passages that have to do with nothingness.
我认为这和文章,关于虚无的其他部分有联系。
-
So it is simultaneously in his very first sentence a Marxist and a Darwinian vocabulary that Eikhenbaum is invoking, and that's what partly accounts for the strenuousness of his rhetoric.
所以艾肯鲍姆文章的第一句话同时引用了,达尔文主义和马克思主义，这部分解释了为什么,他的文章读起来那么吃力。
-
Next time reread for the third time - you will be repaid by your dedication - Books One and Two, this time focusing on the similes. Also, as I mentioned at the beginning of class, read the essays by Stanley Fish and Geoffrey Hartman.
下次再把这两册书读一遍,你们的付出终将得到回报,第一二册书，这次的重点在明喻上，同时，正如我在课的一开始提到的，看斯坦利·费什和杰弗里·哈特曼写的文章。
-
I want to start my lecture today looking back to that handout I gave you -but didn't give you a discussion of--a couple of days ago, ] from that essay Good Readers and Good Writers that I quoted at the very beginning of class this term.
今天我将用几天前发给你们的,却没有进行讨论的资料，开始我们的课程，从那篇叫做“好的作家和好的读者“的文章开始,我曾在本学期课程的最开始引用过它。
-
He's interested in the way in which a reader can come to terms with a meaning conveyed by a text, and that much, as I say, despite the profoundly different nature of their projects, Wimsatt and Gadamer have in common.
他只关注读者如何明白,文章的意思，而这也就是，我所说的，文萨特和葛达玛的共同之处，即是他俩在某些领域有本质上的差别。
-
We'll say a little bit about Beyond the Pleasure Principle, ; which is the crucial text for our purposes; but plainly apart from the influence of and the ideas borrowed from Freud, you'll find Brooks writing on what for you is pretty familiar turf.
我想花一点点时间说说《超越快乐原则》,这篇文章对于我们今天理解主题至关重要;,但是如果不看从弗洛伊德那里借来的思想和影响外，布鲁克斯所写的对于你们来说应该会很熟悉。
-
So Klawans notes in the article you read that the physical substances and states that are labeled impure and are therefore designated as antithetical to the realm of holiness are states that are associated with death on the one hand, and procreation on the other. Why should this be?
克洛文对你们现在读到的文章有过这样的说明,那些被贴上不洁标签,然后被认为和神圣的领域相对立的物质和状态,一方面来说都和死亡有关系，而另一方面和生殖有关，这是怎么回事呢？
-
And while it would be ridiculous for us to read the entire mask as the poet's own completely unfettered autobiographical fantasy, a Miltonic set of interests and a Miltonic set of anxieties charging and fueling this work.
虽然要我们读完整篇文章有点荒谬,因为诗人的自传幻想太无拘无束了，这个作品有弥尔顿式的嗜好,和弥尔顿式的焦虑控诉及刺激因素。
-
The essay that you read in its entirety for today, "Structure, Sign and Play in the Language of the Human Sciences," was delivered on the occasion of a conference about "the sciences of man" at Johns Hopkins University in 1966.
今天我们要读的是一整篇文章，名为《人文科学话语中的结构、符号和游戏》,这篇文章发表于1966年,在约翰普金斯大学召开的一个会议上，会议主题是“人类科学“
-
In the passages you'll read, you'll see that the point is not that art and the judgment of the beautiful is the supreme thing that humanity can be engaged with. The point is only that it has a special characteristic that nothing else has.
在马上要读到的文章中，你们会发现，重点,不是说判断力和艺术是人文学科中,至高无上的，而是说,它具有独一无二的特质。
-
So I'm going to read passages, and I hope you'll jump around with me if you have the text in your hand.
拿到文章的同学，尽量和我一起看,以后上课。
-
Our primary text will be the excerpt in your book from Hans-Georg Gadamer and a few passages that I'll be handing out from Martin Heidegger and E.D. Hirsch.
主要内容就在大家手上课本里,汉斯·格奥尔格·加达默尔的节选以及,我将带给大家的马丁·海德格尔和赫希的一些文章。
-
Whatever danger a particular text may pose to the state is outweighed by the greater harm of the official elimination of that text or by the greater harm of the punishment of the author.
这个文章对政府产生的威胁远远比不上,官方对这篇文章的打压的危害,和作者的批判的危害。
-
It deploys and manipulates those gross constituent units of thought in the ways that we saw, but notice what Levi-Strauss is saying in that essay as opposed to the passage Derrida has just quoted.
它通过我们看到的方式来,调动和使用那些大构成单位，但请注意列维在这篇文章里所说的,与德里达引用的，形成了鲜明的对比。
-
But be aware of that distinction and that article.
现在得知道这个区别和这篇文章。
-
Now one other thing that Hirsch says, the other thing that I quoted, is in effect ] -I'll paraphrase now-- that what Gadamer omits to realize is that there is a difference between the meaning of a text and the significance of a text.
赫施说的另外一点，即我引用的另一点，现在起作用了,我现在开始来释意-,葛达玛没有发现的是,文章的含义和文章的意义之间的差别。
应用推荐