Remember in the Noahide covenant, in Genesis 9, which is a Priestly passage, the Priestly blood prohibition: You may not spill human blood.
在《诺亚律法》中,在《创世纪》的第九章,是一篇祭司的文章,它禁止血液:,不能溢漏人血。
So in all sorts of ways, in this simple passage we find a character the snare of language.
所以在这篇简单的文章中,我们会在很多方面,一个陷入语言陷阱的人。
Obviously, there's something going on in this text that has produced this confusion, or we could think of it as a misreading.
显然,这文章中有些东西,让人产生疑惑,或者是我们可以将它视为是误解。
They read. And one of the people that was reading this literature was a high school teacher who was teaching mathematics in Basil, Switzerland.
其中一个读过这篇文章的人,是个教高中生的老师,在瑞士的罗勒教数学。
Even though some defenders of that particular movement claim it didn't happen, like David Brooks tried to claim in The New York Times.
尽管一些参与这些运动的人辩护,说事实并非如此,如戴维·布鲁克斯在《纽约时报》的文章
I guess it struck the author of that article that Redleaf is just a guy who was very curious about a lot of things.
我认为打动这篇文章作者的是,莱德利夫是一个,对很多事都抱有好奇心的人
Right, we see in this passage something that reveals so much about what the Greek values were and you'll see how closely they were tied up with the polis and the primacy of the polis in their lives.
对的,我们在这篇文章中,看到了很多揭示希腊人价值观的东西,你们能看到他们和城邦以及城邦在他们,生命中至高无上的地位之间有多么紧密相连
I say this in all my classes, I've published thousands of pages on different subjects, all of you can do it better, because you can do it from your own point of view you can do it afresh, you have new resources you are different people, you belong to different generations.
在每一门课上我都会这么说,我在不同课题上都,发表过许多文章,你们都可以做得更好,因为你们可以从自己的角度来做,你们可以做新鲜的,你们有新的资源,你们是不同的人,你们属于不同的一代人。
I know this is true, that is, I know I have the reputation, both because I periodically in my student evaluations get told I'm one of Yale's harsher graders, and because every now and then the Yale Daily News will have an article about grade inflation and they'll always ask me, " ... Well Professor Kagan is somebody..."
这是真的,而我之所以有这样的名声,是因为在学生定期评估时,我被告知自己是耶鲁最严厉的人之一,还因为那不时出现的耶鲁日间新闻,有篇文章会谈到关于成绩膨胀的事,人们总会问我“,卡刚教授“
Nobody can possibly miss in reading Eikhenbaum's rhetorically rather bizarre essay his obsession with struggle, with the fight, and with doing battle.
读完艾肯鲍姆,那篇修辞古怪的文章后,没有人会注意不到他对斗争和挣扎的热衷。
You may have noticed in your Wimsatt essay that there is a footnote to somebody named Joel Spingarn who wrote an essay called "The New Criticism" in 1924.
你们可能还注意到了,上一篇关于文萨特的文章中,有一个脚注提到了一个叫乔·斯宾加恩的人,这个人在1924年写过一篇文章也叫做《新批评》
He would have been what Nietzsche in an interesting precursor text calls "historical man."
他就像是尼采在他的一篇有趣的,有关先驱者的文章里提到的“历史上的人“
He's come to the conclusion that over 90% of the variability of returns in institutional portfolios is attributable to asset allocation and that's the number that I think most people hear cited when they are looking at Roger Ibbotson's work.
他得出结论,机构投资中,超过90%的回报率变动,要归因于资产配置,我想这是罗格·伊博森的文章里面,被人引用得最多的结论
But then if you look at the writings of New Englanders, by the early nineteenth century.
但是如果你看看十九世纪初期,新英格兰人的文章
One of the texts of de Man -also in the book called Allegories of Reading where you'll find also a version of the essay "Semiology and Rhetoric" one of the essays that those who had actually read de Man actually argued about in a persistent fashion is called "The Purloined Ribbon."
德曼的一篇文章,同样在《阅读的寓言》这本书中能找到,在这本书中还能找到“符号学与修辞“的一个版本“,这是一篇读过德曼的人都会,不停争论的文章,它叫“偷窃的缎带“
应用推荐