Why is it worth it to him to take that risk? What's he trying to teach us about narrative and about language that makes it worth this risk?

为什么这值得他承担如此风险呢，关于叙述文章,和让这些风险值得语言，巴斯到底想教会我们什么呢？

耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

In the book in which the essay "The Intentional Fallacy" appeared, a book called The Verbal Icon, Wimsatt collaborated with Monroe Beardsley on three essays, and this is one of them.

意图谬误“是文萨特与比尔兹利一起，为一本叫做《语言象征》的书,写的三篇文章中的一篇。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

So in all sorts of ways, in this simple passage we find a character the snare of language.

所以在这篇简单的文章中，我们会在很多方面,一个陷入语言陷阱的人。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

This is what he says in this first passage. He says: If we study speech from several viewpoints simultaneously, the object of linguistics appears to us as a confused mass of heterogeneous and unrelated things.

这也是他在第一篇文章里说的话：,我们同时从几个角度读这篇文章，这时语言学乱的像一锅粥,没有系统毫无关联性。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选