Let me just read two texts to that effect, first going back to Roland Barthes on page 877.

让我们读两篇和这个意思大致相同的文章，首先翻回877页罗兰，巴特的文章。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

You're probably a little frustrated because maybe you sort of anticipated what he was going to say, and then you read it and you said, "Gee, he really isn't saying that.

如果你差不多猜出了他要说什么的话,你可能会有点沮丧，如果你读这篇文章，就会说：“哎呀，他不是这个意思。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

He's interested in the way in which a reader can come to terms with a meaning conveyed by a text, and that much, as I say, despite the profoundly different nature of their projects, Wimsatt and Gadamer have in common.

他只关注读者如何明白,文章的意思，而这也就是，我所说的，文萨特和葛达玛的共同之处，即是他俩在某些领域有本质上的差别。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

That is Hirsch's other key position, and we can understand it by saying something like this: the meaning of a text is what the author intended it to mean -that is to say, what we can establish with a reliable paraphrase.

这就是赫施的另一个重要观点，我们可以这样理解它：,文章的意思是作者想要表达的,即我们通过适当的释意能够想到的。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选