If the goal is to improve education, then one has to ask hard questions Like does a technology actually help?

假如目标是提高教育，那就要问问这样的问题,技术真的有帮助吗？

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

However, what I'm saying is that it's important, not less important to focus on questions when it comes to education.

但是，我所说的是当提到教育时，关注问题很重要，而不是较不重要。

哈佛公开课 - 幸福课课程节选

And I think you can test that by asking the question: if you could educate a child by the age of six.

你们可以通过,问这个问题来验证：,你能教育6岁的孩子吗。

麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

What are its methods? This is a question asked you might say of every mature science.

我们如何教育一位潜在的政治家,其方法为何？这个问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

This is an unfortunate thing you see throughout education frankly, certainly at the secondary and primary school level where you just insert technology into the classroom and expect to solve problems, that is not in life always the case.

遗憾的是,中小学教育中,就是讲知识然后运用所学的知识解决问题,但是实际生活中不总是这样。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

If people don't know which foods are healthy well then it argues for education--but notice that that was almost the lowest ranked thing that people said.

要是人们不知道哪些食物是健康的,这关乎教育问题了,然而值得注意的是,这是大家提及最少的一个原因

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

It gets to the essence of the question of who is best equipped to educate ? future generations of citizens and civic leaders.

这探触到问题的本质,到底谁最适合教育未来的,后代公民及公民领袖。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

So that would suggest that education is probably not going to get the job done, because that's not the main driving reason because most people know that they shouldn't eat so much junk food, but education is what we default to when we think about what to do.

所以你们可能认为,教育并不能解决这个问题,因为这不是主要原因,大部分人都知道不该吃那么多垃圾食品,教育是思考解决方法时被忽略了的

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选