In the early years of the English Revolution, one of the hottest flash points of political contention was the degree of appropriate state involvement in the church.
在英国革命的早年,政治诉求中非常迫切的一点就是,政府在宗教管理中适当参与的程度。
Hobbes clearly saw himself, in many respects, as founding a political science modeled along that of the early founders of the scientific revolution.
霍布斯很清楚地看到他自己,在很多方面,和早期科学革命的创立者一样,是政治科学的奠基者。
Milton -- and we know this -- Milton was a political revolutionary, and when he anticipated writing the great poem, he consistently imagined that it would be a poem on a nationalist theme.
弥尔顿--我们知道--是个政治革命家,一直以来他所预想的这首伟大诗歌,的主题应该是民族主义的。
But all of this is overthrown, "changed utterly," by the radical politics that altered Ireland during Yeats's lifetime, that announced the coming of modernity and that these two women themselves participated in centrally.
但这一切被推翻了,完全改变“,被叶芝时期的爱尔兰,的那场激进政治革命改变了,他宣告了现代的到来,这两个女人亲身参与其中。
He also shows, however, that normal politics is, itself, dependent upon extraordinary politics, periods of crisis, anarchy, instability, revolution, where the normal rules of the game are suspended.
然而他也同时了解到常态政治,本身有赖于破例政治,诸如危机,失序,不稳定,革命等时期,当游戏的常态规范,遭搁置。
What was revolutionary about, or innovative, ? about Hobbes' political science?
关于霍布斯的政治科学,到底什么是革命性的呢?
应用推荐