A lot has happened since the exuberant optimism of the political spirit that we see in a tract like Areopagitica.
弥尔顿在《论出版自由》中发表了极为乐观的政治思想之后,政治形势发生了很大变化。
And, it follows from him that political liberty means the freedom to act where the law is silent, as he says.
而他的政治自由意味着,我们可以在法律所认可的范畴内,享有充分的行动自由。
This is the pulsating vehicle for his precious theology of free will and for his politics of liberty.
这是他宝贵的自由意志神学观点和,推崇自由的政治主张的充满活力的载体。
This is also important though for Roman politics, because if you're if a freedman, - or even if you're a free person-- sometimes see freemen would connect themselves to a powerful Roman who was higher status than them, because they could use him for important things.
同时对罗马政治也很重要,因为即使是自由人,甚至是自由民-,有时候也会依附有权有势,地位高于他们的罗马人,以谋求他们的帮助。
Many of them also want to participate in its political freedom.
其中不少人还打算参与,其政治自由
They differ according to their IQs; whether they're aggressive or shy; whether they're attracted to males, females, both or neither; whether they are good at music; whether they are politically liberal or conservative.
他们的智商也不同,他们自信还是害羞,他们是否喜欢男人,女人,都喜欢,还是都不喜欢,他们是否擅长于音乐,他们是政治上的自由派还是保守派
It's the rhetoric of liberation that - this is the rhetoric that permeates all of Milton's political prose.
对自由的歌颂,-弥尔顿所有的政治文章都渗透着对自由的歌颂。
But we all know do we not that most contemporary political scientists tend to be liberals. Their values are liberal values.
但我们都知道,不是吗?最当代的,政治科学家倾向于是自由主义者,其价值观是自由主义的价值观。
I would even say the necessary and inevitable conflict between the freedom of the mind and the requirements of political life.
我甚至会说,这是必需,且无可避免的冲突,介于,思想自由与政治生活条件之间。
Not at all.Aristotle emphasizes the mutable character of natural right in part to preserve the latitude the freedom of action required by the statesmen.
绝对不是!亚里士多德强调,自然权利的易变特质部份,是要保留回旋余地,政治家所需的行动自由。
For many today, Hobbes' conception of the Leviathan state is synonymous with anti-liberal absolutism.
对今天许多的学者而言,霍布斯在《利维坦》中的政治主张,就是反自由主义之专制主义的代名词。
This raises a question. Whether the relation between contemporary political science and liberalism is merely accidental or whether there is some intrinsic some necessary connection between them.
这导出一个问题,当代政治科学,与自由主义的关系仅是偶然,或之间,有些本质的,一些必然的,连结介于两者之间。
Are these two things are these two goods as it were freedom of mind and political life ? are they compatible or are they necessarily ? at odds with one another?
这两件事,或可以说是这两项本领,思想自由与政治生活,能共处吗,或者是必然的死对头?
应用推荐