Isn't there a kind of egalitarianism, so to speak, built in to the conception ? of rational animal and political animal?
是否有种平等主义,建构于,理性动物与政治动物的概念之中?
There is, in other words, a kind of a transformative view of reason and knowledge and science, political science, civil science, running throughout Hobbes' work.
换句话说,有一种看待理性的变革性的视角,知识,科学,政治科学,民间科学,都贯穿于霍布斯的作品之中。
They have lots of maybe good-- maybe it's not because they're irrational, it's that they're political or they're constrained by tradition or laws or regulations, all sorts of things; but, they're not holding the tangency portfolio.
他们有很多好的原因-,也许并不是因为他们不够理性,而是由于他们有自己政治上的考虑,或者是他们本身被传统,法律以及规则等一系列的因素,所限制;,因此他们不会持有切线资产组合。
To be a political animal means first to possess speech or reason that allows us to participate in a community or a way of life governed by shared standards of justice and injustice.
要成为政治动物的首要,是拥有演说或理性的能力,以让我们参与社群,或由共享公正,与不公标准所统治的生活方式。
Far from having a sort of rational actor model of politics, he operates with an irrational actor model. He assumes that it is not reason but our passions that are the dominant force of human psychology, our desires, our aversions, our passions.
没有一个政治上理性的典范,他就着手塑造一个,不理性的典型,他假设,感情,而不是理性,是统领人类心理,欲望,厌恶和情绪的主要力量。
应用推荐