-
Does Locke have a way out of this or is he basically sanctioning an all-powerful government, despite everything he says about unalienable rights?
洛克对此能自圆其说吗,还是说他其实是支持万能政府的呢，尽管他说了那么多什么不可剥夺的权利？
-
but who want answers, who want more rights,
但是那些想要得到政府回应，得到更多权利的，
-
So these are the rights we have in the state of nature before there is any government.
这些就是我们在政府产生前,自然状态下拥有的权利。
-
Government can't be the only one with responsibility; if it's not the only one with the power.
政府并非是唯一需要负责的部门",除非它是独掌权利的部门
-
But, they're what we have and I think that we should probably give them the authority to do that job and I think that's what we need to do.
但是，我们能依靠的只有政府了,我想我们也许应该赋予他们,调节市场的权利,这也是我们所需要做的。
-
Take our founding documents " the Declaration of Independence the Constitution all men are created equal that we are endowed with inalienable rights that all legitimate government grows out of consent and the like.
举我们的建国文件,“独立宣言,“宪法“来看，所有人生而平等,我们与生俱来不容剥夺的权利,这是所有合法政府,都认同的概念。
-
Well,De Gaulle has been dead for a very long time, and there has been progress, but what has not changed is still the power in Paris, in these ministries, to dictate the life of schools, of almost everything else.
戴高乐已经去世很久,在某些地方已经有所改进,但是巴黎的权利,政府各部门的权利仍未改变,他们规定校园生活,还有几乎其他任何事情
-
This is actually kind of a moderate position because it talks about government and the people sharing power here and taking responsibility for change.
这实际上是一种中立的立场,即作为分担责任的代价,政府与公民分掌权利
-
It's natural in the sense that we have a fundamental unalienable right that there be property, that the institution of property exist and be respected by the government.
自然权利是说财产权是基本的不可剥夺的,正因为它是这样的权利，所以有产权制度存在，并被政府所尊重。
-
On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.
一方面，我们有不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权，这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃，正是这些权利，造成了对合法政府的限制。
-
It's what we lack the power to give away when we consent that limits government.
而是我们在同意的时候,无权放弃自然权利，从而限制了政府。
-
This seems in many ways to be quite far from the American democracy based on constitutional government, systems of checks and balances, protection of individual rights, and so on.
这似乎在很多方面,有别于美式民主,后者的根基是宪制政府，制衡体系，保障个人权利等。
-
Locke believes in certain fundamental rights constrain what government can do, and he believes that those rights are natural rights, not rights that flow from law or from government.
洛克认为有些基本权利能限制政府的行为，并认为这些权利都是自然权利，不是由法律或政府赋予的。
-
I think if you look at conscription as the government picking out certain individuals to go fight in war, then that would be a violation of their natural right to life.
我想如果你把征兵制,视为政府挑选特定的个人去参战，那确实是对自然权利中生命权的侵犯。
-
If the right to private property is natural, not conventional, if it's something that we acquire even before we agree to government, How does that right constrain what a legitimate government can do?
如果私有财产是与生俱来的，而非约定俗成，如果这是在我们同意组建政府前就拥有的，这个权利又如何能限制合法政府的行为呢？
-
It is a right that attaches to individuals as human beings, even before government comes on the scene, even before parliaments and legislatures enact laws to define rights and to enforce them.
这种权利依附于个体而存在，甚至早于任何政府的建立，甚至早在任何议会和立法机关,制定法律定义权利并强制实施前，就已存在。
应用推荐