• The incentive in Washington is such that it's virtually impossible to cut spending unless you can go to the voters " and say "We don't have the money."

    政府的机制就是这样,削减财政开支,几乎不可能,除非你有勇气对选民说,“政府没钱了“

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • because the government's expenditures are only going to keep the economy afloat for so long.

    因为政府开支就是要保持经济的长期运转。

    担忧未来 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

  • GDP Furthermore, Reagan reduced spending as a proportion of gross domestic product and Clinton reduced it even further You have a bipartisan achievement which alas in the current circumstances it slips.

    另外,里根根据,按比例削减了政府开支,到克林顿执政时,开支进一步减少了,这是两党共同努力的结果,不过可惜如今已不复存在了。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

  • And nobody knows, nobody believes that we can cut spending, right? -Somebody down the road has to pay the bills Somebody down the road has to pay the bills, either by cutting spending, cutting benefits or raising taxes.

    而几乎没人相信,政府能够成功节流,不是吗?,-那总得,有人来埋单啊,迟早要有人来为此埋单的,要么精简政府开支,削减福利,要么增税。

    斯坦福公开课 - 经济学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定