I can't dispose of my life or my liberty or my property in a way that violates my rights.

我不能放弃自己的生命或自由或财产,因为某种程度上说，这侵犯了我的权利。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights to life, liberty, and property is well, they're not, strictly speaking, yours.

第一个答案解释了为什么我们不能放弃,我们的生命，自由和财产权利，因为严格来说，它们不是自己的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

How do I give up my right to do whatever is in my power to secure my person or my possessions, when I have no expectation, you might say, ? that others around me are prepared to do so as well?

我怎么能在我不期望,身边的人会这样做的时候，放弃我保护自身和财产安全，不受侵害的权利？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

Because at the whim of the king, or for that matter, of the parliament, we can name you or you to give up your property or to give up your life.

因为这样的话，国王就可以随心所欲，在这种情况下，就是国会可以随心所欲，让你们中的任何人放弃财产，或放弃生命。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.

一方面，我们有不可剥夺的生命，自由和财产权，这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃，正是这些权利，造成了对合法政府的限制。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

So the real question is how does he himself figure it out between " "I agree to give up my life, give up my property" when he talks about taxes or military conscription for the fact.

所以真正的问题是，他如何能自圆其说以下观点,“我同意放弃我的生命，放弃我的财产“,当他谈到税收制或征兵制时是这样说的。

耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选