• Gadamer's claim, however, was that if we do that, we are in fact suspending the way in which it might be that they speak true.

    然而,葛达玛认为,如果我们那样做,我们很可能放弃了一个,可能告诉我们事实的方向。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • So one answer to the question is why can't I give up my natural rights to life, liberty, and property is well, they're not, strictly speaking, yours.

    第一个答案解释了为什么我们不能放弃,我们的生命,自由和财产权利,因为严格来说,它们不是自己的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • But if we say that,then we've given up on the body view.

    但如果我们这样说,也就是放弃了肉体理论。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • and so I trust that it's easily intelligible as I read it to you now.] In fact, however, we have given up the claim to find, in the past, any truth valid and intelligible for ourselves.

    所以我相信现在我读的时候大家一定会更容易理解],事实上,我们已经放弃了从过去中寻找,对于自己来说靠得住的,可以理解的事实。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • But, I've dropped that assumption and now I'm going on to assuming that they're taking account of their dependence on each other, taking account of their different expected returns, and taking account of their different covariances and variances; so that's what we've got.

    不过我已经放弃了那个假定,我现在假定,我们需要考虑它们彼此间的相关性,它们有着不同期望收益,不同的协方差和方差;,这是我们所学到的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • It's rejected.We're giving up on it.

    它被否决了,我们放弃它。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • On the one hand, we have these unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, which means that even we don't have the power to give them up, and that's what creates the limits on legitimate government.

    一方面,我们有不可剥夺的生命,自由和财产权,这意味着即使我们自己也无权放弃,正是这些权利,造成了对合法政府的限制。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定