• They might articulate a need or a desire, but what we have to do is understand all the technology ingredients and how they're evolving.

    他们可能会提出要求或是愿望,我们所做的事情是搞懂,所有技术成分,以及它们如何演变。

    斯坦福公开课 - 戴尔CEO-Michael.Dell谈创业和发展课程节选

  • And this is the reason why enthalpy was invented and why it's so important. Because we want to know this. So this for a finite change.

    这也就是为什么焓提出,而且如此重的原因,因为我们想知道这些。

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • I'm not quite sure,because we have to turn to a metaphysical question that we've touched upon before,namely,can souls split?

    我不太确定,因为提出一个以前说过的,形而上学的问题,就是,灵魂可以分裂么?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Redleaf went in and said, you should really do it and he convinced them, apparently, and they cut their dividend.

    莱德利夫提出,你们必须这样做,而且他说服了管理层,最终经营者决定降低红利

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Now I had an interesting discussion in section this past week and a couple of really good questions were asked.

    现在我告诉你们刚刚这周所学章节内容的有趣讨论,有人提出几个好问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • Rather, he claims that he wants to hear justice defended the way that no one has ever defended it before.

    相对地,他声称,他想听到正义自卫的方式,是没有人曾提出的捍卫方式。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • If the question of time is not explicitly brought up, then you should know that you have to use this formula.

    如果时间的问题并没有明确提出,那你应该知道,必须用这个式子

    耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

  • is to see through the group of human rights, if there are certain levels of social justice that we can ensure for every last person simply because they are human.

    提出要看到所有这些人权的本质,如果存在不同层次的社会正义,我们就保证每个人获得某种程度的正义,就因为他们是人。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • But let's suppose that I realize that I'm doing a lot of addition in my programs, and I actually want to factor out what seems to becoming a lot of copy, paste.

    但是假如我在程序中做了很多加法,我实际上想提出那些,复制粘贴的东西。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • The challenge is for the work you are going to be doing at the class time we are doing to spend together.

    这一挑战是针对,我们一起在课上,完成的任务提出的。

    麻省理工公开课 - 媒体、教育、市场课程节选

  • This is a scene of whether you as a writer compromise yourself in the face of authority that resists what you want to say.

    场景是作者在面临权威坚持提出反对意见时,是否妥协你想表达的内容。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • When Plato writes his Republic and devotes Book Ten, as I'm sure most of you know, to an argument in effect banishing the poets from the ideal republic, part of the argument is that poets are terrible imitators.

    当柏拉图写《理想国》和《第十卷》的时候,你们肯定都听过这两部著作,他提出了一个一个论点,把诗人从理想国中驱逐出境,他提到,诗人都是拙劣的仿造者。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • He said I am going to propose a model.

    他说,我提出一个模型。

    麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

  • So there's some very interesting questions we'll address in the class.

    在这里我提出几个非常有意思的问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选

  • As psychologists we have to question the natural.

    心理学家对自然而然的反应提出疑问。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • It's important to keep in mind always that what we do can be fun And never lose that sense of fun and enjoy exploring things I think being an engineer is partly just problem-solving and mind-set.

    有一点非常重,就是始终牢记我们所做的事情是令人愉快的,不丧失了这种愉悦感,享受探索的乐趣,我认为成为一名工程师从某种程度上来说,就意味着解决问题,提出创意。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 领导能力简介课程节选

  • Right. - And I think that if he was making a decision to give his life and he took on the agency to sacrifice himself which some people might see as admirable and other people might disagree with that decision.

    对,-我认为如果是他自己决定献出生命,如果是他自己提出要牺牲自己,也许有人会赞颂这种行为,而其他人也许会反对这个决定。

    耶鲁公开课 - 公正课程节选

  • So, I said I'd tell you a little bit more about where this Bohr radius came from, and it came from a model of the atom that pre-dated quantum mechanics, and Neils Bohr is who came up with the idea of the Bohr radius, and here is hanging out with Einstein, he had pretty good company that he kept.

    告诉你们,波尔半径是从哪里来的,它起源于前量子力学时代的,原子模型,尼尔斯,玻尔提出了,波尔半径的概念,这是他和爱因斯坦在一起,他们是好朋友,当我们讨论这个原子模型时你们记住的是,在1911年。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • It points to an exilic date for the work's final composition: that is to say when it was finally redacted, the redactors were in exile, writing for a people living in exile. And the Deuteronomist wants to make it clear that it is fidelity to the Torah, rather than residence in the land that is critically important.

    提出了最终成书是在流放时期:,就是说,当他最后被编辑完成,编辑是被流放的,是为流放中的人而著的书,《申命记》想,表明它对经书的忠诚,而不是土地上的居所,这点非常重

    耶鲁公开课 - 旧约导论课程节选

  • But now that we're here,we're in a position perhaps to raise the question, should we be asking what it takes to survive?

    现在我们必须想提出的问题应该是,怎样才能生存?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But he also encourage people not to study philosophy, or not to end there, and to go study and do something that would actually fulfill the ethical mandates of philosophy.

    但是他却告诉人们不去学哲学,或是不局限于哲学,而是学些别的东西,因为其他的知识可以,实现哲学提出的道德任务。

    普林斯顿公开课 - 人性课程节选

  • I wanted to talk about the theory of interest as presented by Professor Irving Fisher at Yale, who is famous for having exposited that.

    接下来讲的是利息理论,是由耶鲁的欧文·费雪教授所提出的,他因阐述这个理论而出名

    耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

  • Its purpose is to lay bare as it were the fundamental problems the fundamental concepts and categories which frame the study of politics.

    它的目的一向是提出基础的问题,最基础的概念与类别,以建立政治研究的架构。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • So to use an analogy that I think that David Kaplan, a philosopher of UCLA offers you've to think it more like a bologna or salami that you can slice.

    这里我用一个类比,我想是加州大学哲学家大卫提出的,你想象成一条大腊肠或者香肠,你可以切分的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Again let me just pose the question.

    再次提出这个问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • Finally, literary theory asks one other important question it asks many, but this is the way at least I'm organizing it for today it asks one other important question, the one with which we will actually begin: not so much "What is a reader?" but "How does reading get done?"

    最后,文学理论给人们提出其它重的问题,它提出许多问题,但我今天是这样组织的,它提出一个重的问题,也就是我们今天开始提出的问题:,不是“读者是谁“而是“阅读是如何开展的?“

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Well recall from week zero when we took a very real world phonebook and then just last week we had our volunteer come up with the array of pieces of paper on the board and when I challenged myself and when I challenged our volunteer to find me the number 50 both he and I were able 50 to leverage one assumption.

    大家回忆一下,当我们拿着一个现实世界的电话簿,就在上周我们的志愿者,在黑板上提出了纸片的阵列,我挑战自己,也挑战志愿者,找出同一个,数字。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • Well, that's something I want you to think about and maybe I'm sure you'll want to talk about in your sections, but let me propose something like the following to answer or at least to respond to this paradox, this question.

    这是我你们思考的问题,我也确定,你们也想在讨论时段发言,但让我先提出以下这些回答,或至少说是响应这个悖论,这个问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

  • We have to ask oursleves when Socrates puts his argument forward, which of these you have in mind?

    我们问问自己当苏格拉底,提出自己论点的时候,他脑中的是这三个中的哪一个?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But there's one other complication that you've got to be warned about, which is this. Because these are dialogues and they take the form of philosophical arguments, people put forward views and then, over the course of the discussion, change their minds about things.

    但是,还有一个地方,我提醒你们,那就是,由于这些是对话作品,且它们全都采用了哲学论证的形式,即,人们先提出观点,然后,在讨论的过程中,改变自己的关于事物想法

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定