And although we don't have machines that can reason about a lot of subjects yet, it seems pretty clear.

虽然还未曾出现,具有推理能力的机器,这一点相当明确

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It seems like the natural thing to suggest, machines can reason in at least some areas.

但仿佛,机器,在某些领域具有推理能力是再自然不过了

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

We know machines have limited capacities to engage in mathematical and logical reasoning, to recognize things, to do various forms of computations, and this makes it at least possible that we are such machines.

我们也知道机器,在数学推理与逻辑推理方面,在识别物体方面,在完成各种形式的运算方面,的确是拥有有限的能力的,这至少说明,人类就是这样的机器

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

And so it doesn't seem plausible to suggest that we people must not be physical, merely physical, because after all, we can reason and no machine can reason.

所以,人不是物理对象,这一观点似乎并不能站稳脚跟,因为毕竟,我们人能推理而机器不能

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So we had the question, "Could machines, could machines reason?"

于是我们便产生了这样一个疑问,机器能推理吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

People can't just be machines, because machines can't reason.

人,不是机器,因为机器不能推理

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

No mere machine could reason."

没有一个机器可以推理

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

No, machines could reason.

不,机器可以推理

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选