Well, it is the disclosure of error that other forms of discourse supposing themselves to refer to things remain unaware of.

好的，这揭露了一种错误，也就是,其它文体假设自己指出了其它一些人们从未意识到的问题。

耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

And things we've been repeating year after year after year, because they sound so reasonable, suddenly sound unreasonable when some of you point out some aspect of it that you didn't follow.

我们年复一年地重复着那些,听起来天经地义的知识,突然会变得苍白无力,就因为你们中有人指出了,一些你没理解的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

The same pattern Steven pointed out before.

斯蒂文以前曾指出过相同的问题

耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

So it's OK to not specify. I want to point out, pz whether you're in the p x, the p y, or the p z, unless a question specifically m asks you to specify the m sub l, which occasionally will happen, but if it doesn't happen you just write it like this.

我想指出的是，无论你在px，py或，除非一个问题特别地,让你指出l下面的，这种情况有时会发生，这样就可以了,但是如果它不做要求你们写成。

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

Newton says F = ma, so to make it a useful result of this problem, we know the mass of this guy.

牛顿指出 F = ma,这对于解决这个问题很有用,我们知道这个物体的质量

耶鲁公开课 - 基础物理课程节选

All right, so one thing that I want to point out, which I said many, many times on Friday, and this is perhaps the last time I'll say it, but one last time is we can think about why we only see a line for the 2 p orbital, versus we don't see separate lines for a 2 p x, a 2 p y, and a 2 p z.

好的，我还要指出一个问题，这个问题我在上周五已经说了很多很多次了，这可能是我最后一次提到它，但是这最后一次让我们来考虑一下,为什么我们只看到了一条，对应于，2，p，轨道的线,而不是分别对应于，2，p，x，2，p，y，2，p，z，的线？

麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选