Now these ideas of classes, object-oriented programming, data abstraction, are about 40 years old, they're not new ideas.
面向对象编程的概念,数据抽象的概念,都是40年前就有的老东西了。
I tend to prefer things that are more abstract.
我更喜欢抽象点的东西。
Why this struggle, and why must Milton struggle with such awkward metaphysical categories in order simply to address properly the power of light?
为什么弥尔顿必须,与这样一个奇怪的抽象的东西斗争,仅仅是为了恰当的描述光明的力量?
What we're really doing, or I shouldn't say what we're really doing, a basic piece of what we're doing, when we talk about classes or objects, is we're doing something that Professor Guttag mentioned, we're defining an abstract data type.
或者我不应该,说我们真正要做的,当我谈到类或者对象的时候,我们在做的基本的东西,如Guttag教授提到的,就是定义一个抽象数据类型,那么这到底是什么意思呢?
an event or something more abstract like a thought.
对于一种活动,或者像想法一类更为抽象的东西,“is there”也可以胜任。
应用推荐