Aristotle's distinction seems to be not only empirical again based on the factual distribution of powers.
亚里士多德的区别似乎,不只是根据经验的,或说,根据事实的权力分配。
Their professions to justice are just that, they are professions or pretensions expressing their vanity and their ambition.
他们在正义上的专业训练,只是他们的专业,或说自命表达其自负与野心。
just empirically speaking about the Harvard students, looking the trends and statistics-- empirically speaking, Americans are the most generous people in the world.
或只是说哈佛学生,根据发展趋势和统计,美国人是世界上最慷慨的人。
Is he sincere in saying this, in making this point or his he somehow being ironical in his use of the religious tone ? or the religious register?
他说那些话时,是否诚恳地反应其论点,或他只是故做讽刺,才使用那些宗教论调,或是宗教语言?
Do we believe him in this respect, I mean an important question, do we believe him again, ? is he being sincere in this or is he using this as it were a kind of rhetoric ? with which to envelope himself?
我们相信他这番言论吗,我意指一个重要的问题,我们再次自问是否要相信他,他这么说时是否诚恳,或只是利用这类的修辞,来包裹自己?
应用推荐