By the way, in what I'm saying, I oversimplify by supposing that the basic unit of language is a word.
因为我想说的是,我们现在是把语言的基本单位简单化了。
There's a list, but I didn't, I just said I'll bring dessert. It's easy.
有一个食品清单,但我没看,我只是说了,我会带甜点。比较简单。
Could we similarly say, "I didn't really imagine a world in which my mind exists but my body doesn't"?
我们可不可以简单地说,我并没有真正想象到一个,我的心灵存在,但身体不存在的世界
You can feel something cooling off right. I mean simple examples of these happen when you you know, if you buy cold or hot packs.
可以立即反应的东西,你可以感到有的东西会冷却,对吧?,我是说,举个简单的例子。
Let me simply tell you that in time I am going to show you that this formula is inconsistent with the Bohr model.
让我说简单点吧,之后我会向你演示,这个方程式与波尔模型不一致。
Right now it's a simple template, but it's a template for creating what a class looks like, and I now have an x- and y- value associated with each instance of this.
那么大家明白了为什么,我说类是一个模板了,对不对?,现在它只是一个简单的模板,但是它是一个用来-,创建形成一个类的模板。
So, let me tell you a little bit about it.
我给你们简单说一下。
I mean I'm hoping that was a simple exercise.
我的意思是说我希望这只是个简单案例
I'm simply saying swap X with Y, but this 2 won't work, because where are X and Y defined?
我只简单地说交换X和Y,但是这两行不起作用,因为X和Y是在哪里定义的呢?
this court is attributed to him, not 100% sure it's his-- said, "I would not give a fig for the simplicity on this side of complexity, " but I would give my life for the simplicity on the other side of complexity."
这个报告厅就是他捐建的,但不能完全确定是他所有的--说过,“我不会认为与复杂性一致的简单性是微不足道的,但我会把我的一生用来研究与复杂性相对的简单性“
I think it's worth saying a word or two about the word "introduction" as well.
关于介绍这个词,我也想简单说几句。
They divide by n-1 to make it an unbiased estimator of the population variance, but I'm just going to show it in a simple way here.
当除以n-1表示的是对总体的,无偏估计,我在这里只是说的简单一点
You could simply say, "Please, do something".
你可以简单地说,“请帮我做某事”。
In short,even though it's true that nobody can die my death for me, this isn't some deep insight into the special nature of death.
简单地说,即便没人能够经历我的死亡,这也不是关于死亡本质的深刻见地。
It's simpler, more straightforward to say instead, "What I am strictly speaking is a soul."
简单点儿,更直白地说,我严格的说起来就是个灵魂而已
So I'm going to run through a series of these arguments.
我先简单地说一下,这一系列的论证
Remember last time, I said that there's different kinds of complexity in our code, and I suggested for simple branching programs, the amount of time it takes to run that program is, in essence, bounded by the number of instructions, because you only execute each instruction at most once.
但是这里有个很重要的点,记得上节课,我提过在我们的代码中,有不同种类的复杂度,而且我还说了对于简单的分支程序,运行这种程序需要的总体时间,大体上,是和指令的数目相关的,因为每个指令只会被执行最多一次。
s2 So, I'm passing in the first character in s2, I'm making it uppercase and then I'm putting it back so casually speaking this is just capitalizing the first letter of whatever word the user typed in to s2.
那么,我把第一个字符传递给,我把它转换成大写的,然后存下来,简单说,这就是把用户输入s2中的单词,的第一个字母转换成大写的。
So it's not, as I say altogether straightforward to see how the answer " "Death is bad for me, because when I'm dead I don't exist" how that answers the problem as opposed to simply focusing our attention on the problem ? How can nonexistence be bad for me?
所以这并不是,就像我说的,那么简单可以领会到这个答案,“死亡对我来说不好,因为我死了我就不存在了“,如何回答了这个问题,和我们仅仅把关注点放在问题本身相反,不存在怎么可能对我来说有坏处呢?
OK, for example, I might say point p1 is that list, x is 1, y is 2.
和y坐标的数组是很简单的1,那么,例如,我可能会说点。
F-O-O in lowercase and, in fact, foo it is buggy because I typed lowercase F-O-O and FOO yet I get back capital F-O-O as both the original and the copy and that's simply because I haven't done this correctly.
小写的f-o-o,实际上,它是有bug的,因为我输入小写的,而我得到的原始的和拷贝的都是大写的,简单说,我处理错了。
So while you're filling that out, let me tell you a little bit about what we're going to be doing here.
你们一边写一边听我说,我来简单地介绍一下这门课
What I want to say is, the short answer for now is, I don't think it follows automatically.
我想说的是,简单的解释为,我不认为可以顺理成章得出结论
Bruce instead of Shelly, easy enough.
简单地说,我叫布鲁斯而不是薛立
应用推荐