For example, I might believe that it's equally likely that they choose Left and Right, is that right?
举个例子吧,我可能认为他选择,左和右的可能性是相同的,对吗
So I think it depends on the type of the task.
所以,我认为选择要根据项目的特点来确定。
The strategies that are less than 67 but bigger than 45, I think these strategies are not, they're not dominated strategies in the original game.
对于选择大于45而小于67的数,我认为他们并不是,在原博弈中并不是劣势策略
So it's probably not as final line as you might think, at least in my experience and in what I think is the best in government is make your policy choices first and then work out the politics.
所以可能并没有,你说的底线至少在我的经历中没有,我认为对政府最有益的是,先选择好政策,然后再谈政治。
But then I asked another question, do you think trying to pick mutual funds, trying to find a mutual fund that will beat the market is a smart thing to do or not a smart thing to do?
但是接着我又问了另一个问题,你们认为选择共同基金,选择一种强于市场表现的共同基金,是不是明智之举呢
The second one, I guess, involves an active choice of pushing a person down which I guess that person himself would otherwise not have been involved in the situation at all.
我认为第二种情况,牵涉到主动选择推人,而被推的这个人,本来跟这事件一点关系都没有。
So I think it's your choice.
所以,我认为这是你的选择问题。
I think that's also why Barth chose to write this story in the perfect short story form. And that form is also given to us in Lost in the Funhouse, on page 95, when we get the diagram of Freitag's Triangle.
我认为这也是为什么巴斯选择用完美的短篇小说的,模式写这个故事的原因,这个模式在,《迷失在开心馆》里也有体现,在第95页,就是Freitag三角的图解。
Let's look at my payoffs from choosing these three options Up, Middle, and Down, if I think it's equally likely that my opponent will choose Left and Right.
我们来看一下我从上中下这三个策略中,分别能获得什么样的收益,如果我认为我对手,选择左或右的可能性相同
I think that you don't really have self possession if you choose to live in a society because you cannot just discount the people around you.
我认为如果你选择生活在社会中,就不可能完全地自我拥有,因为你不能无视其他人的存在。
So what we're going to look at is the expected payoff of Up versus, let me call it a : a being equally likely that my opponent chooses Left and Right.
所以接下来我们看看在我认为对手,选择左右的可能性相同下的预期收益,我们把它称为
应用推荐