It's often put in terms of the relationship between the part and the whole. I approach a text and of course the first thing I read is a phrase or a sentence.
经常可以理解为,局部和整体的关系,我看到文本后,首先读到的东西理所当然是一个短语或一个句子。
And you see something that makes you very excited. For me, maybe it would be Korean barbeque.
你看到一个让你非常兴奋的东西。对我来说,那很有可能是韩国烤肉。
And I want to ask: what is it that we don't see, when that's all we see?
现在我想问问:,当我们都看到了所看到的东西以后,还有什么是我们没有注意到的?
So, you would expect that when you rip open the skull and look at the brain; you'd see something glorious, you'd see, I don't know a big, shiny thing with glass tubes and blinding lights and sparks and wonderful colors.
所以你会期待,当你打开头盖骨时,当你看到大脑的时候,你会看到些非常辉煌的东西,你会看见,我不知道,附有玻璃管的大块发光的东西,发出耀眼的光芒,不停地冒着火花,拥有美妙的颜色
Well, suppose I want to look at something like an electron in orbit here.
假如我想看到,轨道上像电子一样的东西。
If I want to get out right now the versions of these things, I can ask what's the value of c p 1 x, and it returns it back out.
你可以在那里看到那些,代表笛卡尔坐标点的东西,如果我想要得到现在,这个类的版本的东西的话。
And so I think it's really interesting to see how the mind can contain so much.
所以我想,能看到大脑能容纳这么多东西真是件有趣的事情。
You do see celebrities out. I mean, that is one thing you will see.
你能在外面看到名人。我是说,这是你能见到的东西之一。
So what I wanted to do is loop back, at least with a couple of things that we see recurring and very understandably so, but let's try to clear up a couple of frequently occurring issues.
所以我想要做的是回环,至少用两三个,我们看到的东西返回,并且可以理解地,让我们试着处理几个,频繁发生的事情。
This fellow wrote: I should be very ashamed were I to fall and people have to help me and realize that I could see only very little.
他这样写道:,当我跌倒了人们要帮助我的时候,或者我意识到自己只能看到很少东西的时候,我会感到很羞愧。
So look, why am I justified in believing in germs, various kinds of viruses that I can't see, or bacteria or what have you, that I can't see?
所以,我为什么相信微生物,相信各种肉眼无法看到的病毒,细菌等诸如此类我看不到的东西确实存在
because I see a lot of people with cameras and stuff and...
因为我看到他们都带着相机之类的东西……
应用推荐