Now,what I've been arguing is that,logically speaking, even if you are a physicalist, that doesn't rule out the possibility of survival.

我现在要说的就是，逻辑上讲，即便你是物理主义者，也无法排除生存的可能性。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I think for me an MBA was the next, sort of logical step in my professional development.

从逻辑上来说，读MBA会是我职业发展的下一步计划。

已经成经济学学徒了 - SpeakingMax英语口语达人

So if I try to apply the same logic, well how can I divide and conquer this problem.

如果我想要用同样的逻辑，那么怎样划分,并解决这个问题呢？

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

But that doesn't show that it's really possible, logically possible to have a world in which my mind exists and my body doesn't."

但这并不表示那是真正可能的,在逻辑上可能有一个世界,其中我的心灵存在而身体不存在

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Isn't the reason I think unicorns are logically coherent is because I can imagine them so easily?

我认为,独角兽在逻辑上不矛盾的原因,不正是因为我能够轻易的想象它们吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well let me apply this same logic, let me divide this problem in half, alright.

下面我使用同样的逻辑，将这个问题再次划分为两部分。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

But since I can imagine my mind existing without my body, it follows that my mind and my body have to be logically distinct things.

由于我能够想象我的心灵独立于身体存在,可以推出,我的心灵,和身体在逻辑上是相互独立的

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Because it's possible,logically speaking, that there could be cases in which I survive, but I don't have what I normally have when I survive, and so I don't have what matters.

因为可能从逻辑上来说，可能会有这样的案例，我存活下去，但并没拥有我活着时有的东西，不再拥有我在意的东西。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

It makes sense to me logically that I want to see it first when I open the file; so I scroll on down but only later is increment declared.

这个逻辑上对我是有意义的，打开文件的时候,我想先看到它，所以我向下翻,之后才声明increment函数。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

And for Problem Set 0, too, those of you might think Scratch kind of imploding since I was 6, well then we'll hand you some of these little logic boards which are a variety of real world sensors you can connect to your Mac or PC and push yourself a little further with interactions, with the real world.

对于习题集0也是如此,有些人可能认为从我6岁开始就不怎么用Scaratch了,那么我给你一些小的逻辑板,它们就是各种各样的真实世界的感应器,你可以用它们来连接到你的手机或电脑上去,和现实世界做进一步的互动。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Let me go ahead and call print F. I'm going to say A equals A and then I need a percent D, backslash, comma A; so this is a little bit of -- more syntax than would be nice, %d but I'm just saying, literally, A equals percent D, and I'm plugging in the value of A for percent D.

我们继续调用printf，我说明A等于,然后我需要%d，反斜杠n，逗号;,所以这个有点--偏向逻辑的，而不偏向美观的，但是我刚说了，字面上，A等于，我用%d插入了A的值。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Logically looks like I'm safe because I know what I'm doing here.

逻辑上看起来是安全的,因为我知道在那里我做了什么。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

All we mean here is logically possible.

我这里所指的,都是指逻辑上的可能性

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选