So the very next arguement that Plato turns to can be viewed I think, as responding to this unstated objection.
所以柏拉图紧接着转向的论点,我认为可以被视作,对这个没有陈述的反对观点的回应。
We have in Plato's own words here, the way he viewed politics and his reasons for his political philosophy.
我看到了柏拉图自述,他对政治的观点,以及他对自己政治哲学的理解。
Now, it's not my purpose here to try to argue for or against Platonism with regard to abstract entities.
我的目的不是,试图去辩护或者反对,柏拉图哲学中的抽象实体这个概念
I mean, the Greeks didn't -- Plato's Symposium, all of these guys are sitting around having a drinking party.
我是说,希腊人不这样 --,在柏拉图的飨宴上,人们坐在那里举行酒宴
The ironic fact is, because the New Testament is considered more important by people, there are a whole lot more people who take my New Testament classes than go over to the Classics Department and take a course in Plato.
讽刺的是,由于人们认为新约更重要,所以在我新约课堂上的人,远远多于,在古典学系选修柏拉图的人。
I'm including here people like Aristotle and Plato, Hume, Locke, Freud and Skinner.
我所说的这些学者包括了,亚里士多德,柏拉图,休莫,洛克,弗洛依德以及斯金纳
That is a course that I like to teach, too; usually I teach Plato to T.S. Eliot or Plato to I.A. Richards or some other important figure in the early twentieth century.
这也是我喜欢教的一门课;,我通常教从柏拉图到T。S。艾略特,或从柏拉图到T。A。理查兹,或者其他20世纪初的重要人物。
As a teacher of mine used to say "You read Plato your way " I'll read him his way."
如同我一位老师常说的,“你们以你们的方式阅读柏拉图,我会以他的方式来阅读他“
I'm going to actually pause, periodically look at my notes and make sure I'm remembering how I think Plato understands the arguments.
我会时不时停下来,看看我的笔记,以确保,我记得我自己对柏拉图论证的理解
Hobbes wrote, "I am at the point of believing that my labors will be " as useless as the commonwealth of Plato."
贺伯斯写到,“我在此要相信,我的努力将如同,柏拉图的国家一样不具实用“
Those of you who would like to know more about it, I recommend reading more Platonic dialogues or taking a class in ancient philosophy.
如果你们当中有谁想做更多的了解,我推荐去读柏拉图对话集,或者选修古代哲学课程
But for now, what I want to do is talk about Plato's democracy and ours.
接下来,我想要谈的是,柏拉图与我们的民主。
I don't know how many of you have not read any Plato before, but for those of you who haven't, I actually think you're in for a treat.
我不知道你们当中有多少人,之前未曾读过柏拉图的作品,但是,还未拜读过柏拉图的同学们,我敢肯定你们会喜欢上他的
Because, after all, this isn't Plato saying, "Here's what I believe explicitly."
因为,毕竟柏拉图也没有说,这就是我明确相信的观点
What I'm going to do is basically run through my attempt to reconstruct-- my attempt to lay out the basic ideas from this series of four or five arguments that Plato gives us.
我要做的是,基本上是重新,把柏拉图给我们的这4,5个论点中,一些基本的观点拿出来讨论一遍
So the point I'm suggesting is that many of Socrates' students and associates including Plato himself had some connection with this oligarchical government that had ruled Athens for a brief time.
所以,我想讲的是,许多苏格拉底的学生或是同僚,包括柏拉图本身,都与这个,曾短暂统治雅典的,寡头政府有关连。
At the very end of the class I suggested that look, even if we were to grant to Plato that in order to think about justice, circularity, what have you, we had somehow grasp the forms.
下课之前我曾提到,即使我们同意柏拉图的观点,要思考,合理圆满诸如此类的概念,我们必须要先抓住这些形式。
And, in a sense, one could say maybe this is not Plato's last word, I mean why does Socrates choose to stay and drink the hemlock?
或者也可以说,这并非柏拉图的结论,我是说为何苏格拉底,选择停留并服下毒参?
Now, bracket the fact that, as I just explained, I don't myself find the argument from recollection persuasive. I don't think we got any good reason to believe based on the sort of things Plato draws our attention to.
我刚刚解释了,我并不觉得源于记忆的论证,有说服力,在柏拉图让我们注意的,这些观点的基础上。
Now, the objection I've just raised is not the objection that Plato raised in the Phaedo, but he does raise a different objection.
我提出的反对观点并非是,柏拉图在斐多篇里提出的反对观点,但他确实提出了个不同的反对观点。
The exception is Plato, where I'll lecture, maybe two lectures, trying to reconstruct Plato's central arguments, at least the arguments relevant to our class.
例外是柏拉图,我将授课的,也许要两节课,我会重新构建柏拉图中心理论,至少这部分理论是和我们的课相关的。
In order for a more or less round plate to remind me of roundness, Plato says, I have to have already met perfect roundness itself.
如果一个或多或少,有点圆的盘子能让我想到正圆,柏拉图认为,我必须已经见过完美的圆本身了
In fact, we have, and I want to read to you in just a moment a lengthy transcript of Plato's own account of why he came to write the Republic.
实际上,我们握有,我马上就会与你们分享,柏拉图冗长的亲笔解说,为何他要撰写《理想国》
Now the answer seems to me, the only answer I can imagine Socrates and Plato are giving at this point is to say, look, I need a different 3 definition of invisible, not 2 but 3.
我认为答案是,我所能想到的唯一答案是,在这点上苏格拉底和柏拉图,给出的答案是,我需要一个,无形的不同定义,不是2而是。
Well, there are the various parts of our physical body, but there's also our soul. Remember, as I said, in introducing the Phaedo, Plato doesn't so much argue for the existence of something separate, the soul, as presuppose it.
肉体由许多不同的部件组成,但是同样也有灵魂,我在介绍斐多篇的时候,提到柏拉图并没有花大力气,去辩证肉体之外存在个什么东西,他直接默认了灵魂的存在
应用推荐