it seems to me the right thing to say " about the example is "No, that is my watch."

我觉得好像我应该说,“不，那是我的手表“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

My watch was dissembled for a period of time, perhaps we should say my watch didn't exist during that period of time.

我的手表在修理的时候消失了，我们或许该说我的手表,在修理的那段时间，并不存在。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But it got put back together and now that's my watch.

但后来它被重组了,现在还是我的手表。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I just have to confess, I don't know what the best thing to say about these cases, I find myself inclined to think reassembled watch, same watch; reassembled tower, not same tower.

我必须得承认，我不知道,究竟怎么样解释这些例子好，我发现自己还是觉得,重组的手表是原来的手表;,重搭的塔并非原来的塔。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

But still, that's not my watch.

但是这不是我的手表。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

and he cleans all the pieces embosses them and polishes them and then reassembles the whole thing and a week later I come back and ask "Where is my watch?" And he hands it to me.

他擦干净所有零件,把它们雕琢好，擦亮,他将所有零件重组,一周后我回来问他,“我的手表呢？，“他交给我。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

That's not my watch."

那不是我的手表“

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选