Again, thank you for joining us, Paul Raushenbush my name's Paul Raushenbush, associate dean of the Religious Life at Princeton University, and until the next time, breathe.
再次感谢大家的参与,我是,普林斯顿大学宗教生活的副院长,在下次节目之前,呼吸。
And so everything's kind of new for me, again, coming back to London after 2 years.
所以对于两年后回到伦敦的我来说,再次地,所有的事物对我来是都是新鲜的。
So again,I'm going to suppose here on out that the metaphysical view that I've been sketching is right; that physicalism is true.
所以我要再次假设,我描绘的那个形而上学的观点是正确的;,物理主义是正确的。
I think part of the message here is that... I want to mention just one more, I'm afraid we're out of time But believe it or not, I could talk to you for another 24 hours.
我觉得需要传达的信息是。。。,我想要再次重复一遍,我担心时间不够了,信不信由你,我可以跟你再聊,24个小时。
So, what I want to do today-- again, this is a parallel-holding-pattern lecture.
我今天要讲的是,再次强调,这是一门同步课程
So this code is identical functionally nonswitch c to the last implementation we saw, nonswitch.c, but I'm just ever-more emphatically saying, "In case 1," that is when n equals 1 -- or when case 2 applies -- when n equals 2 or when n equals 3 do what?
所以这些代码到最后的实现上,功能是,完全相同的,但是我想要再次强调一下,“在case,1“,那是当n等于1时1,或者当case,2适用-,当n等于2或者当n等于3,它将做什么?
应用推荐