Now here's a question for you guys, which we're going to vote on, so you better start thinking about it.
现在我希望,大家来,判断一下。
It says if this is a string of length 0 or 1, I'm done. I'm going to return the answer true.
我就会返回答案为真,否则的话我得判断它。
I didn't want to make that judgment call for her when she said I am, what did she say?
我不想为她做判断,当她说,她说了什么?
And I also wanted you to identify why, it's also important to understand why we have these trends, not just to memorize the trend itself.
而且我还需要大家判断原因是什么,这很重要,对于我们理解,为什么有这些规律,仅仅记住这些规律是不够的。
if I say I don't like baby killers, that actually is a moral judgment in my case.
如果我说我不喜欢婴儿杀手,这就是一个道德判断了。
I'm going to let you try to figure that out qualitatively without doing any math.
我希望你们能不经数学运算,而定性判断出结论。
Aristotle calls this kind of knowledge this kind of practical judgment Phronimos he calls it by the term phronimos that I have on the blackboard.
亚里士多德称这种知识,这种实际判断力,他称之为,像我在黑板上所写的。
Well I made up some answers too and let's just use these as hypothetical examples.
我也想了一些答案,我们仅把这些作为假定的判断标准
990 to 2006 very easy I saw the car every day in my garage.
990年到2006年很容易判断,我每天都看到车子放在车库里。
I just like it or I just don't like it according to principles that can be understood as arising from the faculty of judgment and not from the faculty of the understanding, which is appetitive, and the faculty of reason, which is moral.
我只是根据原则来判断喜欢还是不喜欢,这也可以被理解为从判断力出发,而不是从本能的理解力,或是道德上的理性出发。
How do I determine whether or not I am happy?
我如何判断自己是否幸福?
I'm really liberal, but this disturbs me because I am looking at you, I'm trying to see from your reaction how much of my lecture you are following, and then it's very distracting when people are talking.
很无所谓的,但是我很不喜欢有人说话,因为我正看着你,我要根据你的反应来判断,我的课你听懂了多少,但是如果有人说话的话,就会让大家分神
Do I have two yes answers if you wanna check two conditions at once? You know, this might seem to be a bit of a new context for some of you but consider a typical website.
我能不能对两个条件同时判断,来看看它们是不是都为真?,这些概念可能对你们中一些人有点新颖,那么就考虑一个典型网站。
it's looking first to see am I in the base case, which I'm done. If I'm not I'm just going to reduce this to a smaller computation.
注意这个计算是干什么的,它先判断我是否属于基础事件,这个我已经做过了。
It has a test in it, which is that while, while something is true, do something, but I want to keep doing it.
也有个测试在里面,也就是那个当,当一件事情为真的时候,做一些操作,但是我想一直进行判断。
So as I said, they're going to be identical in terms of making the decision that way.
因此就像我说的,如果用这种方法来判断,它们应该是完全相同的。
Given that that's true and I already checked the two end points, that's true, that's true.
假设它是真的而我已经判断过,两端的元素是否相同了。
And that's what my judgment about "no killing babies" makes it a moral judgment.
这就是为什么我说,“不许杀婴儿”是一个道德判断。
Python So I'm using the Python try except to check whether or not the thing is in the memo or not.
所以我将让,去调用except去判断该物品,是否已经在memo中。
Well, I could look at the value here, and compare it to the value I'm trying to find, and say the following; if the value I'm looking for is bigger than this value, where do I need to look? Just here.
然后把它和目标数做个比较,然后做出如下的判断:,如果目标值大于这个值;,那么我应该去哪找呢?对,应该在这里,对不对?不可能在那儿。
So I can't use thinking about the Williams cases as a method of deciding what do I really believe, the body view or the personality view?
因此我不能采用Williams的案例,来帮助我们判断我们应该相信哪种理论,肉体理论还是人格理论?
By moral judgment I mean not empathetic feelings, not feelings of caring and love or approval and disapproval, so they're not feelings of caring and love and empathy, but notions like something is good or bad, something--like something is fair or unfair.
我所说的道德判断不是移情,不是关心,爱,认同或不认同,道德判断不是关心,爱或移情,而是好坏之分,公平和不公平之分。
应用推荐