-
Now we can't neglect the first question here, which is at least for me: did Milton really believe this?
现在至少对我来说，我们不能忽略一个问题：,弥尔顿真的信这个吗？
-
OK, so do we know anything so far that we can point to that would give us a departure?
好，到目前为止我们能在我们了解到的,东西中找出一些违背这些规律的例子吗？
-
And in any event, our primary concern is with the program of the texts as they stand before us: is there a symbolism operating here?
无论如何，我们主要关心的，是摆在我们眼前的,这些计划大纲：存在象征主义吗？
-
When I said in Week One that you don't actually have zeros and ones inside this header file; right?
在第一周我说过的，我们在这个头文件中,是没有二进制的，是吗？
-
And we're having a difference of opinion as to whether we should use a tuple or a list here, right?
可以“是结果,明白了吗？我们队在这里是应该用数组,还是链表还有一些不同意见对吧？
-
Clearly, Milton is in some way wonderfully speaking through the Lady here. Then we get the Lady again: Shall I go on?Or have I said enough?
确实，弥尔顿在一些方面【笑】,让这位女士替他说话，让我们继续看这位女士：,我应该继续吗？还是我说的够多了？
-
And that's consistent with other things that we've seen, Remember the whole thing about the perfect crystal at zero degrees Kelvin has zero entropy It's completely ordered.
这和我们看到的其他东西自洽吗？,想想零摄氏度下的,完美晶体的熵为零,这是完全有序的。
-
Should we conclude,therefore, that the key to the important question--namely, What matters? the answer to that question, should we conclude,is,same personality?
我们是否就该得出结论，重要问题的关键，也就是什么是最重要的，这问题的答案就是相同的人格吗？
-
It has every relevance to psychology: Do we perceive reality, human nature as constrained or unconstrained will ultimately affect our psychology.
它与心理学息息相关：,我们认识了现实吗，对人类本性执不同观点,最终将影响我们心理。
-
Furthermore doesn't the study of old books often very old books ? risk overlooking the issues facing us today?
此外，研究这些巨著,通常年代久远,不会有忽略我们今日所面临议题的风险吗？
-
Can we altogether dispense with the idea that certain things we take pleasure in are better or worthier than others?
我们能摒弃这个观点吗,即我们某些喜好，比其它更好或更有价值？
-
Now, this question is fun to have fun with in some ways because it's fraught with stereotypes, isn't it?
探讨南方的特点很有意思,因为这其中充满了我们的成见,不是吗
-
Can you give me, say, three or four reasons why what we're about to hear differs from what we just heard?
你能告诉我三四个原因吗,为什么我们马上要听到的音乐与刚听过的不同
-
Do we ever escape from his head? You're saying that you don't you didn't feel like you ever could, in the world of this prose.
我们能从他的想法中跳脱出来吗，你要说的是,你觉得你不能，在这个散文的世界里。
-
It would be kind of exhilarating, wouldn't it, to be able just to have something before us.
这令人兴奋，不是吗，可以只看在我们眼前的东西而不加解读。
-
Is it all of us or should the beneficiary is our public policy, is those who have already had manages or privileges or multinational corperations or corperation procisely.
是我们所有人吗？,还是公共政策的制定者？,还是仅限于有特权的人？,或者跨国公司或其他公司。
-
In this case, we have an example that even markets, human institutions as they are messed up right?
在这种情况下，我们有一个例子即使在市场经济中，他们也是人为的金融机构也会出错,是这样吗？
-
Do you think that's true or is it something that we inherently feel a repulsion towards.
您认为是这样吗？,还是说我们天生,对于这些问题就很反感？
-
So, remember we solved this problem earlier in the class, but we were talking about orbitals.
记得吗我们之前的那个问题，我们讨论的是轨道。
-
So if we go back to the Cheetos and the cockroach and we look at our different criteria, and we ask ourselves, is it found in nature?
我们回头再看奇多和蟑螂,我们参照不同的标准,回答如下问题,它是存在于自然界的吗
-
I'm gonna keep as part of each stock, it's history of prices, which we can initialize, well, I've initialized it as empty, but that's probably the wrong thing, right?
我会把股票的历史价格，作为每只股票的一部分，我们可以先对它的历史价格进行赋值，好了，我先给它赋了空值，但是这样做可能不对，是吗？
-
Now if we accept the body theory, then of course we turn to the question ? "Could I survive my death?"
如果我们接受了肉体论，我们肯定会问,我可以死后复生吗“
-
Isn't this amazing that 2,000-2,500 years ago, we still have the letters of the man ? who wrote this book?
这不是很神奇吗？已经2，000-2，500，年了，而我们仍握有,写下本书的作者亲笔信？
-
The humans will become like gods, knowing good and evil, ; Not because of some magical property in this fruit; And it's not an apple, by the way, Do we know what the fruit is?
人类能像上帝一样，分辨善恶，不是因为这果实有魔力;,顺便提说一下，它并不是苹果，我们知道那个果实是什么吗？
-
Now this is interesting because remember the generation has died off, that saw the Exodus and Sinai, right? So these are the children now and they're saying, it was us, every one of us who is here today.
这十分有趣你们还记得已经逝去的那一代以色列人吗，见证了出埃及记的那一代这些人是他们的子孙,而他们说，是我们，我们每一个今天在这里的人。
-
Now that already tells us what we know, which is that the efficiency is going to be something less than zero, right?
我们都知道这个，这结果就是说效率,是负的，对吗？
-
A good example--we used it a moment ago-- of a disjunct melody is-- Can we all sing that?
我们之前听过的一段曲调,是一个跳进旋律的典型例子,我们大家一起唱好吗
-
You know we all say, "Ah, nature, isn't nature nice? Isn't it pretty?"
我们常说：,“啊！自然！自然不是很美妙吗？自然不是很美好吗？“
-
Can't I view this thing, as we might say, objectively?"
我们想问，我们难道不能客观地对待存在吗？
-
Shouldn't we study the average because we concern not just with elites?
我们不是应该研究普罗大众吗,因为我们关心的不只是精英？
应用推荐