-
Now I'm not going to hear, pursue of the question of "Do we believe bodily resurrection occurs or will occur?"
现在我不需要，大家一直争论,我们是否要相信,肉体复活是否会发生“
-
On the other hand, as I said, never trust a programmer to do the right thing so we're going to check it.
另外，如我之前提到的，别相信程序员会一直保持正确,所以我们才要。
-
If Milton's true muse, or so he hopes or so he wants us to believe, has a Christian origin, then this counter-muse is unquestionably classical.
如果弥尔顿他望或想要我们相信，他真正的缪斯女神，有一个基督教的原型，那么这位与缪斯女神相对的人物毫无疑问是经典的。
-
Let's suppose that in order to believe in something, you've got to be able to picture it.
让我们先假设要相信一件事，这件事必须是可以被想象的。
-
We believe that there is a lot more progress that can be made.
我们相信，要改进的地方还有很多。
-
Why should we believe Hobbes' story ? and not some other story?
为什么我们要相信霍布斯的故事,而不相信其他的故事？
-
Well, why should we believe this?
我们为什么要相信他的观点呢
-
Milton has expended, we know, a considerable amount of energy in establishing what he wants us, I am assuming, to believe is the divine authority behind the poem.
我们知道弥尔顿花费了，大量精力阐释他希望我们相信的东西，我设想，他要我们相信在这部诗篇的背后有无上神权的存在。
-
So what we now need to ask is, can we possibly believe that revision?
所以现在我们要问的是，我们可能相信那样的修正吗？
-
Now I'm giving you my reasons for believing in there're no souls.
现在我要说说,为何我们该相信人没有灵魂。
-
Still, all I can say is, why should we believe two?
然而我想问,为什么我们要相信前提二
-
Way back at the start of the semester when we asked,Why believe in souls?
学期一开始的时候我们研究过为何要相信灵魂的存在？
-
Basically that the various arguements that might be offered for believing in souls don't seem very compelling upon examinations so there's no good reason to posit this extra entity.
基本上要我们相信灵魂的,不同的理据,都经不住考察,所以我们没有很好的理由,来假设这个额外实体的存在。
-
So it's at least worth emphasizing the fact that even if we don't believe in souls, we could still believe in the possibility of surviving one's death, the death of one's body.
所以我们至少要强调,即使我们不相信灵魂论，我们还是可以相信死后复生的,可能，肉体死亡后复活的可能。
-
Do we believe him in this respect, I mean an important question, do we believe him again, ? is he being sincere in this or is he using this as it were a kind of rhetoric ? with which to envelope himself?
我们相信他这番言论吗，我意指一个重要的问题，我们再次自问是否要相信他，他这么说时是否诚恳,或只是利用这类的修辞,来包裹自己？
-
I think probably we shouldn't believe the theory of belief which says that in order to believe in something, you've got to be able to picture it or believe it.
我觉得我们不能相信下面这种理论,如果要相信一件事情，这件事情必须能够被想象出来。
-
It's natural to talk that way, but if we want belief in the soul to help us hold out the possibility at least that there might be life after death, then I think we need to actually say that strictly speaking, it's not that a person is a soul plus a body.
这说起来很轻松,如果我们想要寄托于,相信灵魂的存在,而让死后能够继续活着有据可依,那么我们需要一个严格的说法,不是说一个人是灵魂加肉体
-
And so one can ask, "? "Is Thrasymachus wrong to believe this?"
我们因此要提问，“Thrasymachus，这么相信错了吗“
-
what Tolstoy is trying to convince us of, what he's trying to argue, by illustrating the claim, I take it, that Tolstoy is making, is that most of us are actually in Ivan Ilyich's boat.
托尔斯泰试图通过这个故事，阐述给我们，要说服我们相信的东西，我认为他要说的是,我们中大多数人都像Ivan，Ilyich一样。
应用推荐