-
So, it's a sick obsession with some of us, myself included. So with that said, what can you do?
我们看起来对这个有近乎病态的强迫了，包括我在内，你们能什么？
-
It looks like we're cut off the screen a little bit here, but you can see I've just circled it there.
看起来我们屏幕的边缘部分有些没显示，但是大家可以看到我刚才把它圈出来了。
-
Now here's a question that we can still ask, at least it looks as though we can still ask it.
现在我们仍然可以继续讨论,至少看起来我们可以继续探讨
-
Well, it looks like it took 1 in this case or it involves-- we can put it another way, merging those two lists involved looking at two numbers, 1, 2, and that's it.
在这种情况下看起来只用了1次-,我们可以从另一个角度看，合并这两个列表涉及到了,2个数字，1，2，就是这样。
-
Well, if we wanted to draw that, we have HF, whoops --It looks something like that.
如果我们想画他，哎呀，它看起来有点像那个某个东西。
-
After all that looks a lot like the Downs-Hoteling model, we've got two candidates exactly at the middle, is that an equilibrium?
毕竟那看起来很像当斯-霍特林模型,我们有两个绝对在中间的候选人,那是个均衡吗
-
In this class we're going to explore, throughout the course, what seems natural to us and try to make sense of it.
本堂课，我们将探索，通过这一课程，将我们看起来自然的事情,试图搞清楚。
-
Well, let's look at the simple version first, because it's easier to look at. At the top.
好的，让我们看看一个，简单的版本，因为这样看起来。
-
One of the reasons this understanding seems so problematic is the idea that we don't appeal to the authority of an author in making our mind about the nature of a given field of discourse.
这种理解之所以看起来有问题,一个原因就是我们不会为了弄清一个特定领域话语的本质,去诉求作者的权威。
-
Contradictions and inconsistencies in contemporary religious society are so much like, or at least look so much like, the contradictions and inconsistencies that we find in a work of literature, that we find in a poem.
在永久的宗教社会中矛盾和对立,很像，或者是至少看起来很像，我们从文学著作和诗歌中,发现的矛盾和对立。
-
I think it's really looking like we are in a recession.
我认为，看起来我们真的在经历经济衰退。
-
Let's take a step back and ask are all kinds of cells really the same and start by talking about two cells that I know you know are quite different.
让我们退一步并问一句,所有细胞真的都是一样的么,我们不妨从两种,看起来截然不同的细胞谈起
-
Well, i mean a cockroach might be seen as being harmful because we consider them dirty, disgusting, revolting insects and we don't define insects as something we eat, at least in our culture.
蟑螂看起来可能是有害的,因为我们觉得它脏,恶心,是令人厌恶的害虫,我们不把害虫定义为食物,至少在我们的文化中是这样的
-
It might look a little bit similar to a question we just saw, but hopefully you'll find that it is, in fact, not the same question.
它看起来和我们刚看过的一道题很像，但希望你们能发现，这不是同样的题。
-
Let's re-draw this, so it looks a little bit neater, where we have a triple bond in the middle instead, and again, we need our negative 1 charge there.
让我们重写这个，这样看起来更整洁一点，我们有一个三键在中间，同样地，我们这里需要一个负电荷。
-
So numbers bigger than 67 seem pretty crazy choices, but crazy isn't the word I'm looking for here.
那些选大于67数的人看起来挺傻的了,但他们傻不傻不是我们要关心的问题
-
So if we have a look at what the answer would be, this looks very familiar.
如果我们来看看答案是什么，它看起来非常的熟悉。
-
It's going to take a little bit more work, so let's see if we can do it.
这看起来有点麻烦，让我们看看怎么求复杂度。
-
Well, the world had to come up with another symbol that looked as similar as possible just for people's sanity, so they went with equals equals.
好的，我们必须提出另外一个,看起来符合人类思维习惯的符号，所以他们采用了“==“
-
There are a lot of aspects of how we are and what we are and what we do that seem so natural to us.
有很多方面,我们是怎样的，我们是什么，我们做什么,对我们而言，看起来很自然。
-
There's a whole bunch of stuff at the top which is wrapping in an ugly way 'cause I've made my font so big.
顶部有一大堆封装好的东西,看起来很丑，因为我们的字体设置的很大。
-
It didn't look very much like us at all, but we could sort of see the resemblance in a vague kind of way, right?
看起来几乎不怎么像我们,但我们可以或多或少的,找到些和我们相似的地方
-
Seems like we've got everything you could possibly want to describe in a game.
看起来我们好像得到了,进行一次博弈所需的所有的要素
-
We don't have data on individual city basis but it really looks like the housing collapse price collapse--that we're going through now is on a magnitude not paralleled since The Great Depression of the 1930s.
我们没有每一个城市的数据,但是看起来似乎房价真的崩塌了,价格崩塌-现在我们正经历着,自从三十年代大萧条以来,史无前例的衰退。
-
And then, having given the counter example That is to say, what I'm going to give is an example of an argument just like it, or at least an argument that seems to be just like it where we can pretty easily see that that argument doesn't work.
在给了这个反例之后,也就是说,我要给一个,与之相似的论证的例子,或者至少看起来,与之类似的一个论证,我们能够很容易地看到,那个论证是不正确的
-
So, it looks like this is good, because we'll have some separation in terms of not everyone's going to get 100% in terms of recitations here, which is what we're going for.
这看起来挺好的，因为我们总会有些分别,不是每个人都能百分之百做对所有习题%,而让每个人都能做对正是我们所追求的。
-
So if we have constructive interference between the two, what we're going to see is our molecular orbital looks something like this.
如果两者是相干干涉，我们看到分子轨道,看起来是这个样子的。
-
So this should immediately look like a problem because we know, in fact, that methane is tetravalent, and this is telling us it's only divalent.
显然这看起来是一个问题,因为我们知道实际上，甲烷是四价的，而这告诉我们它仅仅是二价的。
-
Now we have all this data, and this Aristotelian model is looking goofier and goofier.
现在我们拥有这些数据，这个亚里士多德模型,看起来已经越来越愚蠢了。
-
So it looks a lot less messy if we just draw our Lewis structure like this for h c n, where we have h bonded to c triple bonded to n, and then a lone pair on the nitrogen there.
这看起来整洁了不少,如果我们把氰化氢的路易斯结构画成这样的话，这样我们就有氢与碳之间的单键和碳与氮之间三键，然后还有一对孤对电子在氮这里。
应用推荐