• That is to say, how do we form the conclusion that we are interpreting something adequately, that we have a basis for the kind of reading that we're doing?

    也就说,当说到我们能够解读某个事物,或对正在进行的阅读有一定基础,我们如何得出上述结论的?

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • The right conclusion, I think, is: the reason we write down these models is to try and capture and test our intuitions.

    我觉得合理的结论应该,我们建立模型的目的,为了更好地描述事实激发灵感

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • The reason I think it doesn't follow trivially is because, remember, I said we're dealing with interactionist dualism.

    我认为它并非自然地得出结论的原因,记住,我们在和心物交互二元论打交道

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • And we've seen that that's generally the case.

    我们已经发现这一个很一般的结论

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

  • And the implications are that we'd like to build a confidential and dynamic theoria of decision-making that I can account for the widespread decisions that people making, those when they are inrrational reflected when they are not And we'd also like a better remapping of disease on sympton profiles, so that we can address those symptoms better.

    结论是,我们希望建立起有关决策的新兴学科,籍此来对人们的非理性决策,做出解释,同时我们也希望能够对疾病的症状作出更好的了解,从而能够更准确地确定病情。

    斯坦福公开课 - 7个颠覆你思想的演讲课程节选

  • So what we end up with is one radial node for the 2 s orbital of hydrogen, and we can apply that for argon or any other multi-electron atom here, we also have one radial node for the 2 s orbital of argon.

    那意味着它们都径向节点,所以我们得出的结论是,氢的2s轨道1个径向节点,我们可以将它应用,到氩或者任意一个多电子原子,对于氩的2s轨道。

    麻省理工公开课 - 化学原理课程节选

  • You put these things together and you get the conclusion that we, since we've got free will, can't be a purely physical object.

    综上所述 你就能得到这样的结论,由于我们有自由意志,所以不可能纯粹的物理对象

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • But I think, as we think it all through we have to conclude it doesn't work. Okay.

    我认为,我们考虑了一遍,给出的结论是它说不通,就到这里。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • It would seem to give us three, the conclusion we want-- that which grasps the ideas or the forms must be eternal or non-physical.

    我们似乎就得到了第三条,也就我们要的结论,能认知理念,或者型相的事物必须永恒或非现实的

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • So in fact the model, in addition to the sort of nerdiness of the model, it ended up with a result we kind of believe in.

    所以实际上这个模型,除了那些烦人的部分,它的结论是值得我们参考的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • So the main lesson I want you to get from this is that not only did it matter that you need to put yourself in other people's shoes and think about what their payoffs are.

    从中我们得出的主要结论是,不仅你要,站在别人的立场上,思考别人的收益什么样的

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • And it may be that what we should conclude is, whatever the best answer to that question is, it's not the question we should really have been thinking about.

    也许我们能得出的结论是,无论这问题最佳的答案什么,这都不我们最该考虑的问题。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • My argument must be wrong because it goes against the lesson of the class and the lessons of the class are gospel right, they're not wrong ever, so what's wrong with that argument? Yes, Ale Well because you have to be able to agree, you have to be able to speak to them but we aren't allowed to show our partners what we wrote.

    这个说法肯定有问题,因为这和我们的结论刚好背道而驰,结论是绝对正确的,结论没错,那这个说法错在哪,艾尔,因为你必须要能够达成一致,你需要和他们谈判,但我们不允许同伴看到我的选择

    耶鲁公开课 - 博弈论课程节选

  • If that which grasps the ideas or the forms must be eternal/non-physical, well one thing we're going to get is, since that which grasps the forms must be non-physical, the soul is not the body.

    假如能认知,理念或者型相的事物必须永恒,非现实的,那么我们能得到的结论是,既然能认知型相的事物必须非现实的,而且灵魂并不肉体

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • That's equivalent to doing the integral, and so, what we end up getting is that the reversible work v2 pdv is equal to minus integral V1, V2, p dV.

    这与刚才的积分过程效果相同,最后,我们得到的结论是可逆过程的功,负的积分,从v1到。

    麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定