-
We need to believe that the soul, unlike an engine, can't itself be destroyed, can't itself decompose, can't fall apart.
我们需要相信的是，灵魂和发动机不同，自己不会毁灭，自己不会腐烂，自己不会变成碎片。
-
We posit--or the fans of souls posit-- the existence of souls so as to explain something that needs explaining about us.
我们 或者灵魂论的拥护者们假设,灵魂是存在的,这就能解释一些我们自身不解的东西
-
The philosophic city is introduced as a metaphor to help us understand the education of the soul.
哲学之城的导入,是要作为一种隐喻,协助我们了解灵魂的教育。
-
But, it doesn't guarantee it, because absent further argumentation, there's no guarantee that the soul survives the death of the body.
但这不能保证,由于缺乏进一步的论证,我们无法保证,在肉体死亡后灵魂仍然存活
-
Given the thesis about recycling, then, we have reason to believe the soul will continue to exist after we break.
如果循环观点是正确的,那么我们有理由相信,灵魂会在我们消亡之后继续存在
-
The soul, we now say, based on the argument from recollection, the soul is one of our prior parts.
我们现在讲灵魂,在源于记忆的论证的基础上，灵魂是我们之前的一部分。
-
All right. We've been talking about arguments that might give us reason to believe in the existence of an immaterial soul.
我们已经讨论了,那些让我们相信,灵魂存在的论证
-
It's one of the parts that makes us, that goes up into making us up, goes into making us up.
灵魂是组成我们的部件之一,它帮助构建了我们,它构建了我们
-
He didn't actually convince me of that, but suppose we thought souls are simple, and we think simple things can't split.
他并没有说服我，但让我们假设灵魂就是简单的，并且简单的东西无法被分裂。
-
And if that's true, then of course, we no longer have an argument for the indestructibility or nearly indestructibility of the soul.
而如果那是对的，当然我们就,不能再论证灵魂的不可摧毁性,或者几乎不可摧毁性。
-
Perhaps the argument shouldn't be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object could reason."
也许论证不应该是,我们必须相信灵魂,因为所有的物理对象都不能推理
-
The one we started with-- you need the soul to explain the animation of the body-- that argument, I think, doesn't work.
我们一开始提到的那个观点,你需要灵魂来解释肉体的生命力,我想那个论点并不成立
-
That's a little bit like the case we worried about when we started thinking about the soul view,right?
这就有点像我们刚开始研究灵魂观点时,担心的问题了，对吧？
-
That's what we need, if we're really going to become convinced of the immortality of the soul.
这是我们需要的，如果我们要真正信服,灵魂是不朽的这种观点。
-
We'd sort of have some reason to believe in the soul until we sort of see what next argument comes down the road.
我们可能会有理由相信灵魂的存在,直到我们沿着这个方向探究到其他论证的存在
-
So maybe that's why we need to believe in souls in order to explain free will.
或许我们需要相信灵魂的理由就是,为了便于解释自由意志
-
He seems to represent what Plato or Socrates will later call the spirited part of the soul, something that we want to return to.
他似乎代表着,柏拉图或苏格拉底,稍后所称灵魂精神的部份，类似我们想要寻回的境界。
-
Way back at the start of the semester when we asked,Why believe in souls?
学期一开始的时候我们研究过为何要相信灵魂的存在？
-
So if the argument's going to be, "We need to posit the existence of a soul in order to explain creativity," Again, that just seems wrong.
所以如果这个论证要说,我们必须假定灵魂的存在,才能解释创造力,再一次,这看起来是错误的
-
If he can convience us that the soul is not like harmony of the body, maybe there will be some sort of problem for the physicalist.
因为如果他能说服我们,灵魂不像是身体的和声,那么就会给物理学家留下些问题了。
-
But at least it would give us some reason to believe in the soul.
但至少它给了我们一些相信灵魂存在的理由
-
Well, Plato's very next argument attempts to persuade us that indeed we do have reason to believe that the soul is one of the prior-existing pieces.
柏拉图下面一个论证就试着,说服我们有理由相信,灵魂原来就是存在的
-
The first, approach is this that we considered was the soul theory of personal identity, the key to being the same person is having the same soul.
首先，我们设置的前提是,人格同一性的灵魂存在论，成为同一个人的关键在于,拥有同样的灵魂。
-
Is it a book about the power of poetry and myth, what we would call the whole domain of culture to shape souls and to shape our societies?
这是本关于诗学与神话力量的书吗，即我们所谓形塑灵魂的文化整体范畴,同时亦形塑了我们的社会？
-
We will initially think about the first question: Do we have any good reason to believe in souls at all?
我们将要开始考虑第一个问题,我们到底有没有理由去相信灵魂的存在
-
So even we grant the soul is invisible as well, maybe the soul also is a invisible thing that can be destroyed.
所以即使我们认同灵魂也是无形的，也可能灵魂是无形但是,可以毁灭的东西。
-
If we grant that to Plato, he thinks we've got an argument for the immortality of the soul.
如果我们同意柏拉图这个观点,他认为我们就有了支持灵魂不灭性的论据
-
So let's ask ourselves, "Are there things that we need to appeal to the soul in order to explain these things about us?"
所以让我们扪心自问,有没有这样的现象,需要我们诉诸于灵魂,才能对其作出合理的解释
-
Again, our question was, "Do we need to appeal to souls to explain something about us?"
我们的问题是,我们是否需要诉诸灵魂来解释我们自己
-
And that's the crucial premise or some conclusion for the immortaility of the soul because then Socrates invites us to think about the soul.
而这些是得出灵魂不朽的,重要前提,因为苏格拉底接下来邀请我们,思考灵魂的问题。
应用推荐