It turns out not, but it does evince the fact that we have some basic syntax like mathematics and equal signs and whatnot with which we can now start using for more useful purposes.

结果不是那样的，但这的确有个事实,我们有些基本的运算法则和等号和,其他一些东西，用来为我们一些,更多有用的目的而服务的。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

Here is Hobbes' rewriting of the Golden Rule in terms of these laws of nature but these raise a question for us ? as readers of Hobbes. Right? Don't they?

这里霍布斯从自然法的角度,重写的黄金法则,但是这给我们这些霍布斯的的读者们,带来了一个问题，对吧！不是吗？

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

More generally speaking, we might say, they're subject to deterministic laws... that, as physical objects, it's true of them that they must do what the laws of physics and laws of nature require that they do.

我们甚至可以这样说,它们受制于决定性的法则,即,作为物理实体,它们必须按照,物理定律和自然法则的要求去做

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

v We don't know what it is yet. In order to change this from a p to a V, you have to use the chain rule. So let's use the chain rule.

为了把这里的p变成,我们需要利用链式法则,好，让我们使用链式法则。

麻省理工公开课 - 热力学与动力学课程节选

The natural laws for Hobbes are not divine commands or ordinances, he says, but they are rules of practical reason figured out by us as the optimal means of securing our well-being.

对霍布斯来说，自然法不是神圣的法令,或者条例，但这些是,我们发现的实践理性的法则,就像一种最佳的方式保护我们的幸福生活。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

That's how he often writes about human behavior, that we obey the same laws of physical attraction as do any other bodies that we might choose to describe. They describe how bodies in motion always and necessarily behave, these laws of nature.

这是他经常说的人类行为，我们遵守同样的物质吸引的法则,其他人也一样,他们描述运动中的身体,经常而且肯定会，体现出自然法。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选

What are we to make of these laws, ? as I've asked before? In one sense, there seems to be a genuine moral content to Hobbes' laws of nature which can : be reduced to a single formula: Seek peace above all other goods.

就像我曾经说过的那样，我们会怎样制定这些法则呢，从某种角度看，在霍布斯的自然法中,似乎有一个真正的道德内涵,可以简化成一个公式：,在一切物质层面之上寻求和平。

耶鲁公开课 - 政治哲学导论课程节选