Last year we had 4% inflation 4% inflation is high by traditional standards.

去年，我们有4%的通货膨胀,用传统标准衡量，4%是很高的了。

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

This is 3.091 and we have standards here.

这是3。091，我们有自己的标准。

麻省理工公开课 - 固态化学导论课程节选

Notice that if we say that,then there's something somewhat misleading about the standard philosophical label for the problems we've been thinking about for the last couple of weeks.

如果我们这么说，那就有了对这些问题,的标准的哲学标签的误解,我们过去几周一直在思考。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, unlike the choosiness studies, here we actually have some pretty good cross-cultural data So one study, for instance, was done in 10,000 people from thirty-seven countries, ?" asking people, "Who do you want to be with?"

与伴侣选择标准研究不同，我们事实上有一些很好的跨文化数据,例如，有一个调研,以来自37个国家的1万个人为调研对象，问他们“你最想和谁在一起“

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

So to be clear, we expect most students to very comfortably pursue the standard edition of the P set, but for this particular P set, and we have about 150 or so of these out on the hallway, and we'll have them at office hours throughout the coming week--this is a little logic board ; with lots of sensors; the sound sensor, a light sensor, a little joystick and the like.

我希望我们大多数同学,研究问题集的标准版本，可编程版有个特殊的问题集，我们会在接下来的几周里，在办公时间为大家做解答,这是个小的逻辑板,上面有很多传感器;,包括声音传感器，光传感器，小操作杆等。

哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

If we defined food differently: that it's something that nurtures the body, something found in nature, something that doesn't harm the environment-- there are a number of criteria one can apply to define a food-- then we might come up with a different definition than this, but this is the way the nutrition field generally looks at it.

如果我们给出不同的定义,滋养身体的物质,在自然界找到的物质,不会威胁到身体的物质,有很多标准可以拿出来定义食物,我们也许可以就此重新进行定义,但这就是营养学看待食物的方式

耶鲁公开课 - 关于食物的心理学、生物学和政治学课程节选