• OK. So if we have variables, one of the questions we can ask is, what's the type of the variable.

    好,如果我们有一个变量,我们要问的问题之一就是,这个变量的类型是什么?

    麻省理工公开课 - 计算机科学及编程导论课程节选

  • Of course in the central test case this is what we all care about, for the unfortunate events that befall virtuous people.

    当然,这是我们归根到底都关心的一个问题,因为德行之人也会遭遇不幸。

    耶鲁公开课 - 弥尔顿课程节选

  • But this is a -- this raises a problem, that we'll see actually in just a moment having this duplication.

    但这就引起了一个问题我们刚才看到了,我们有一个重复的值。

    哈佛公开课 - 计算机科学课程节选

  • Well, however we settle that issue, notice there's still one other assumption that all these positions still have in common.

    不管我们如何解决这个问题我们都会发现有一个假定,是这些观点都共的。

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • There is also the question of what kind of reader we are that this preface brings up and sort of puts in front of us.

    有一个问题我们是什么样的读者呢,在这个序言面前。

    耶鲁公开课 - 1945年后的美国小说课程节选

  • The passage is: Here there is a sort of question, call it historical, of which we are only glimpsing today, the conception, the formation, the gestation, the labor.

    这段话是:,有一个问题吧,关于历史的,我们今天只粗略地看看,它的设想,构成,妊娠,和分娩。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Next we will deal with what's the--arguably-- the single most important thing when we listen to any piece of music and that is its musical form.

    接下来我们要处理一个争议的问题,音乐作品中的最重要的部分是什么,那就是曲式

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • There is a homeless person " and--but these are day-to-day moral questions we struggle with all the time and so there's a centrality in the study of how we do moral reasoning.

    有一个流浪汉走来了“,这些就是我们每天,都要应付的道德问题,所以这当中有一个中心,存在于我们的道德推理研究中。

    耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

  • We'll come back to them a little bit later when we start talking about the question, "Could machines be creative?"

    稍后再对其继续讨论,当我们开始探讨这样一个问题,机器创造能力吗

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • Before we get to suicide, you might say, the question that's going to entertain us for the remaining few weeks is this.

    在我讲到自杀之前,你可能会说,剩下几个星期里让我们有兴趣的,问题是这样一个问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • One of the reasons this understanding seems so problematic is the idea that we don't appeal to the authority of an author in making our mind about the nature of a given field of discourse.

    这种理解之所以看起来问题,一个原因就是我们不会为了弄清一个特定领域话语的本质,去诉求作者的权威。

    耶鲁公开课 - 文学理论导论课程节选

  • Let's just ask the question,Is it true that the soul theory-- if only there were souls-- is it true that the soul theory would at least have the following advantage?

    我们就问一个问题,如果灵魂理论是真-,如果灵魂的存在-,灵魂理论就能以下优势吗?

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

  • All right. Let's listen a little bit more to the Musorgsky and then we're going to go on, just a bit more to the next excerpt, and here's my question for you.

    好,咱们来继续听听穆索尔斯基,然后我们继续下去,到下一个选段,这里就问题

    耶鲁公开课 - 聆听音乐课程节选

  • And in a moment, I'll ask whether it's the best possible explanation, but before we do turn to that question, there is an objection to this entire way of looking at things that's probably worth pausing for a moment and considering.

    而马上,我要问你们这是否是最好的解释,但在我们转向那个问题之前,有一个对这一整套,看待问题的方式的反驳,或许值得我们稍微停留并考虑一番

    耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

$firstVoiceSent
- 来自原声例句
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定
小调查
请问您想要如何调整此模块?

感谢您的反馈,我们会尽快进行适当修改!
进来说说原因吧 确定