-
And have no idea who they are.
而且我们并不知道他们是谁。
-
That is to say, if something causes literature, there must be some sort of authority behind it and therefore we find ourselves asking, "What is an author?"
即是说，如果文学有缘由的，它的背后一定存在作者,所以我们会问，“作者是谁？“
-
We can't know exactly and this is one of the wonderfully unsettling things about this stanza we can't know exactly to whom Milton is addressing this stanza.
我们不能确切的知道,而这也是这一段很奇妙的不确定性所在,我们不能确切的知道弥尔顿这一段是在对谁讲话。
-
"Who are you, Socrates," we are inclined to ask, "? "to tell us what we can read here and listen to?"
我们不禁要问：，“你是谁，苏格拉底，究竟想告诉我们该读与该听什么“
-
They wake up.We need some way to refer to these people, so we can start talking about who they are.
他们醒来之后，我们需要让人们，了解这种情况以便探讨他们是谁。
-
But we will talk more about who these Canaanites were and how complicated, in fact, that presentation is.
但我们将会更多讨论这些迦南人到底是谁,还有这些描述到底有多么复杂。
-
They," the "they who convicted us of guilt," well, that's hard to identify. Who is that?
她们宣告我们有罪“,她们是谁，这很难说？
-
Who has taught you and other people in our culture what food is all about?
是谁在我们的日常生活中,教会我们什么才是食品
-
That's something we've mentioned already three weeks ago, two weeks ago, we're going to take that fix now, we're going to assume you know who these candidates are.
我们在三周或两周前已经提到过,现在来讲一下这种情况,我们假设你们知道这些候选人是谁
-
Anonymous means we don't know who wrote it.
匿名的意思是我们不知道是谁写的。
-
If it's "us", who is "us"?
如果是“我们“，那谁是“我们“？
-
At least we figured out who the enemy was.
至少我们弄清了敌人是谁。
-
And now I met a prompt that says who I am as a little reminder.
我们会很快看到一个提示，表明我是谁。
-
Now this is where the omniscient narrator comes in quite forcefully, and gives us something to work on as we analyze Haze and we think about who he is as a character and where he finds himself.
万能的叙述者就这样,富有说服力的出现了，同时在我们分析Haze的时候,给我们带来了问题,让我们去想这个角色到底是谁,他在哪里发现自己。
-
It sums it all up: introduction, who I am, and why we are historically connected.
在介绍中，总结了全部，关于我是谁，以及为什么我们会有历史性的联系。
-
First we have to get clear on what am I what are my parts.
第一我们必须清楚我是谁,我的身体是什么。
-
Finally, literary theory asks one other important question it asks many, but this is the way at least I'm organizing it for today it asks one other important question, the one with which we will actually begin: not so much "What is a reader?" but "How does reading get done?"
最后，文学理论给人们提出其它重要的问题,它提出许多问题，但我今天是这样组织的,它提出一个重要的问题，也就是我们今天开始要提出的问题：,不是“读者是谁“而是“阅读是如何开展的？“
-
Now we've figured that out, we figured out who the winner is, and I know that all of you have been trying to see if you won, I'm going to leave you in suspense.
现在我们来已经知道谁是赢家了,我知道你们都想知道自己是不是赢家,我留下个悬念
-
So how can we say that " justice means helping friends and harming enemies," : Socrates asks, "when we may not even be sure " who our friends and our enemies really are?
所以我们如何能说,正义意指协助朋友并打击敌人“,苏格拉底提问，“尤其是当我们甚至无法确定,谁是真正的朋友及敌人？
-
So things are not... I haven't given you the numbers for the middle but... So you can see that whoever it was who said, you're slightly better off, you score with slightly higher probabilities when you kick to your natural side is exactly right.
所以事情不像是……,我虽然没有给出中路的概率,但是,我们先不管这些数字到底是谁总结的,我们发现我们走运了,当你从自然方向攻门的时候,你进球的概率会稍微提高
-
We don't know the intended recipient of this letter, and we actually have no idea whether Milton actually sent the letter; but a couple of drafts of this letter actually exist in Milton's own hand, and the letter is clearly a document that Milton had devoted some energy and some time to. We need to look at it.
我们不知道收件人是谁，我们也不清楚弥尔顿到底有没有寄这封信;,但这份信的草稿确实在弥尔顿那里，弥尔顿显然对这封信投入了不少,时间和精力，我们来看看。
-
So given that we only have one five dollar bill does there have to be one unique winner, and if so, how is that determined if we have multiple people who are That's a good question. If there's multiple winners, we'll divide it but we'll make sure everyone has a positive winning.
现在那里只有一张5美元钞票,是不是说只有唯一的赢家啊,要是这样,怎么确定谁是赢家,好的,要是有多个赢家,我们会平分奖金的
-
In a way, there's a subset of questions that arises from those, to the effect that this is, of course, what we'll be taking up next time: the question "What is an author?"
从这些大问题中又会产生一些小问题，这些问题也将是我们以后会讨论的：,关于文学的缘由，我们接着又会问，“作者是谁？“
-
So I've often wondered if we're to read this differently: Who am I? I am who I am, and never you mind.
有常想如果我们以不同的方式解读：,我是谁？，我就是我，与你无关。
-
Anybody, again this is a 115 kind of exercise, we're going to be moving lines around.
谁知道,这是经济学115的习题,我们要移动这些值线
-
If we torture this one,this thing,whoever it is, Linda is going to think to itself,I'm Linda.
如果我们折磨这个人，这个东西，不管它到底是谁，它将会心想，我是。
-
Who are they to us? We find it difficult to bewail their absence.
他们是谁？，我们发现很难为他们的离去悲叹。
-
Shelly Kagan But we don't know which one that is.
我们还是无从而知谁是。
应用推荐