Later in the term, we'll spend part of a lecture talking about, how do we find such a test suite?
在晚些时候,我们会话一节课的部分时间,来讨论这个话题,我们怎么找到这么一个?
But story, that's what the plot is about, and if that's what the plot is about, how can we avoid calling it content?
但是情节又都是围绕故事的,所以我们怎么能否认,故事是内容呢?
You want to think about how much attention and primacy we should give to an author's statements about what her work mean--as readers.
对于作者对自己作品的阐述和说明,我们怎么注意,怎么给予优先度也不为过。
So I mean philosophy can talk about how do we know we got a table here between us. Right?
比如,哲学可以告诉我们是怎么感知到,我们之间有一个桌子,对不对?
Milton's infusing this passage with a powerful sense of -- I don't know, what can we call it? -- of gender nonconformity and cultural relativity.
弥尔顿在这段中注入了一个很强烈的思想,我也不清楚,我们怎么叫这种思想呢?这种性别的不一致和文化的相对性。
It's got this funky looking form, right, it says, I've got something that I'm going to call a class, got that key word class right here.
以及我们怎么来使用这些方法,因此我要回到类这个概念上来,让我们来建立第一个类吧,就在你们课堂手册的这儿,我会去定义一个类。
And then when we got to more of a cellular level, that we could actually understand how our body worked as low of a level as thinking about cells.
肺怎么工作,我们到了细胞的层面上研究问题,从细胞的角度理解给我们身体,怎么工作就更加有趣了。
What can we say about those choices? Somebody right behind you, the woman right behind you, shout it out.
我们怎么评价他们的选择,找你身后的,你身后的那位女士,请大声说
Since what we want to know is whether the soul is immortal, how do we know it can't break.
既然我们想知道,灵魂是否不朽,我们怎么知道它会不会破裂呢。
How do we start to make a connection between what we hear and what things mean?
我们怎么能把我们听到的和它们的涵义,联系起来?
And yet if a computer can only count up to 2 billion or maybe 4 billion, I mean, what do you then do?
如果一台计算机只能够支持20亿,或者40亿,那我们该怎么办?
And there are some more differences too in language. So what are we to make of this?
是不同的,同时,它们使用的语言也是不同的,那我们要怎么理解这一点呢?
And then, people discover, "Well, this is interesting but how can I use it?"
之后人们发现,“恩,这很有趣但我们怎么用呢?“
In the light of human mortality, the disinterest of the gods, the chanciness of life, what can man do to achieve happiness and immortality?
既然人生苦短,又没有什么神灵保佑,生死都只是随机事件,那我们怎么才能达到幸福和不朽呢
And one personal issue within any of us is what would we do in such situations?
我们所有人都面对的一个个人问题就是,在那种情况下,我们会怎么做
How can we get a half note that actually equals now three quarter notes?
我们怎么加上一个二分音符,从而正好代表了三个四分音符呢
Or what if the British begin to outdo us in the world trade department?
或者,"万一英国在贸易上压倒我们了怎么办"
The bad news is it seems like whatever we do, it doesn't matter.
坏消息是,看来不论我们怎么做,都无关紧要。
But let's take a look at how we do this.
但让我们看看我们该怎么做。
How do we know that everyone choosing 1 is the Nash Equilibrium in the game where you all chose numbers?
我们怎么知道在那个数字游戏中,选择1就是这个博弈的均衡呢
And what we want to do then, is we want to basically come up with, how do we characterize the growth-- God bless you-- of this problem in terms of this Quadra-- sorry, terms of this exponential growth.
现在我们想要做的就是,我们怎么来量化增长率呢?,在这个问题中也,就是框架-对不起是,输入指数的增长。
So, let's go ahead and make sure we can draw that, if we have interest either in the area of organic chemistry or biochemistry or biology here.
那么,让我们来确认一下我们已经学会怎么画了,如果我们对有机化学,生物化学或者生物学中的任何一个领域感兴趣的话。
And it should make sense where we got this from, because we know that the binding energy, if we're talking about a hydrogen atom, what is the binding energy equal to?
很容易理解,我们怎么得到这个的,因为我们知道,结合能,如果,对氢原子来说,结合能等于什么?
What are we to make of Milton's use of this striking and painful image of prophetic preparation?
我们怎么把这个引人注目,令人痛苦的形象,用于弥尔顿的身上呢?
OK. So to do this, we need a little more abstract way of talking about efficiency, and so, the question is, how do we think about efficiency? Typically there's two things we want to measure.
好,为了达到这个目的,我们需要用一种有点,抽象的方式去讨论效率,这衍生出来,一个问题,我们该怎么去认识效率?,主要来说我们有两个要量化的东西。
How do we explain the fact that the person who's conducting the seance knows things about, your history that only your dead uncle would know?"
我们怎么解释通灵的那个人,好像真的知道,只有你死去的叔叔才知道的故事
Somebody who's not a math major, tell me how I solve out for the maybe the math majors can't do it actually, it's too simple.
谁不是数学专业的,告诉我们怎么解呀,数学专业的觉得它太简单而不屑去解
Or, "how is it that somehow we are?"
或是,我们怎么那么快乐“
Remember "The Big Five," how we evaluate people on "The Big Five?"
大家想想”大五人格“,我们怎么用”大五人格“评价一个人?
OK? And in fact, if you look at the code up here, and it's on your handout, the very first one, x 1, right here- if I could ask you to look at it-- is a piece of code to do it. And I'm less interested in the code than how we're going to analyze it, but let's look at it for a second.
实际上,如果你看看,你们课堂发的材料上面的代码,第一页上的,就是那-,大家请看看实现的这一部分代码,我不太关心,我们会怎么解释这个代码,首先让我们先看看。
应用推荐