-
That is to say, how do we form the conclusion that we are interpreting something adequately, that we have a basis for the kind of reading that we're doing?
也就是说,当说到我们能够解读某个事物，或对正在进行的阅读有一定基础，我们是如何得出上述结论的？
-
We did something a little bit less nerdy, that is, we drew some pictures that represented what we'd found.
我们也使用了不那么烦人的,通过一些图型来得出我们的结论
-
Should we conclude,therefore, that the key to the important question--namely, What matters? the answer to that question, should we conclude,is,same personality?
我们是否就该得出结论，重要问题的关键，也就是什么是最重要的，这问题的答案就是相同的人格吗？
-
There are corollaries for those ideas in terms of the kinds of effects that literature has and what we might imagine ourselves to conclude from them.
这些想法,都带来一些必然的结果,有关文学的作用，以及我们想象自己能从中得出的结论。
-
Now, in the South what developed and let's define it at least quickly what developed was one of the world's handful of true slave societies.
当时的南方变成了什么样,至少我们很快就能得出结论,当时的南方变成了世界历史上,为数不多的几个真正的奴隶社会之一
-
And, he concluded, let's get his name on the board.
他得出一个结论，让我们先把他名字写在黑板上吧。
-
And we could perhaps draw two conclusions from this.
从中，我们可以得出两个结论。
-
So what we end up with is one radial node for the 2 s orbital of hydrogen, and we can apply that for argon or any other multi-electron atom here, we also have one radial node for the 2 s orbital of argon.
那意味着它们都是径向节点,所以我们得出的结论是，氢的2s轨道是1个径向节点,我们可以将它应用，到氩或者任意一个多电子原子,对于氩的2s轨道。
-
The reason I think it doesn't follow trivially is because, remember, I said we're dealing with interactionist dualism.
我认为它并非自然地得出结论的原因是,记住,我们在和心物交互二元论打交道
-
What conclusions would we come to about the nature of death if we had to think about it from a secular perspective?
我们能得出关于自然死亡的什么结论,假如我们必须从,世俗的观点考虑它呢？
-
Should we conclude therefore that, ? no, you should always be thinking about the facts about death?
那么我们是不是应该得出结论说，不，你应该一直考虑着关于死亡的事实？
-
But of course,nobody here is screaming, from which we can conclude none of us really do believe, fundamentally,deep down,that we're going to die.
但当然现在在场没人在尖叫，那我们得出结论，我们中没有人，从根本上相信自己会死。
-
What's the first thing that jumps out at you from this picture?
我们首先能得出什么样的结论呢
-
We can say this in two different ways.
我们可以从两个方面得出此结论。
-
So should we conclude,therefore, that what really matters is not just survival but having the same personality?
那么我们是否就能得出以下的结论，真正关键的不是存活本身而是拥有相同的人格？
-
Well, should we conclude, therefore, so nobody really believes that they're ever in dreamless sleep?
那么我们就应该得出结论，没有人真正相信,他们可以进入无梦的睡眠么？
-
We are rather entitled to the bolder conclusion the soul can't be destroyed. Full stop.Period.
我们有权得出这个更大胆的结论,灵魂不会毁灭，句号，到此结束。
-
And it may be that what we should conclude is, whatever the best answer to that question is, it's not the question we should really have been thinking about.
也许我们能得出的结论是，无论这问题最佳的答案是什么，这都不是我们最该考虑的问题。
-
So we got the immortality of the soul after all.
所以我们最终得出灵魂不朽的结论。
-
So what does everyone notice from this picture?
从中我们能得出什么结论
-
The engine is a prior existing part, so can we conclude then that from the fact that argument from recycling, cars get reused, get rebuilt, when cars get destroyed, its parts is still around.
发动机是之前就存在的一个部分，所以我们可否得出结论说,根据源于轮回的论证，汽车重复使用，重新组装,汽车坏了的话，它的零件还在。
-
So, in fact, it is true, it is in fact true, so we can conclude that 2 dominates in fact, we can do a bit better than that we can say strictly dominates 1.
事实的确如此,我们可以得出结论立场2优于立场1,或者更进一步说,立场2严格的优于立场1
-
If we want to get anyplace on the question about the nature of the good life, what we need to focus on is not the instrumental goods and bads, but rather the intrinsic goods and bads.
如果我们想在,何为“好的人生的本质“问题上得出结论，我们需要专注的不是利用价值的好与坏，而是固有价值的好与坏。
-
So the main lesson I want you to get from this is that not only did it matter that you need to put yourself in other people's shoes and think about what their payoffs are.
从中我们得出的主要结论是,不仅你要,站在别人的立场上,思考别人的收益是什么样的
-
As I say, there are philosophers who've argued that way, have denied that we have free will and if we do conclude that we don't actually have free will, then we no longer have this argument for the existence of a soul.
有哲学家按照这种思路,否定了人有自由意志,如果我们由此得出,人没有自由意志这个结论,那么这个论证也不再,支持灵魂存在这个说法
-
Then much later on, when we looked at some more complicated payoffs and a more complicated game, we looked at a different lesson which was this: put yourself in others' shoes to try and figure out what they're going to do.
在这之后我们通过研究更复杂的收益,以及更复杂的博弈,我们得出了另外一个结论,站在别人的立场去思考,他们会怎么做
-
Because,indeed,they don't exist They're merely possible And we might say,you've got to exist in order for something to be bad for you But once we say that it seems we're running towards the position that in that case,death can't be bad for me because of course,when I'm dead,I don't exist ? So how can anything be bad for me?
因为他们其实并不存在,他们只是一种可能,我们由此认为你必须首先存在,某事才会让你害怕,但我们一旦这么说,我们似乎会得出这个结论,这种情况下死亡不可能让我害怕,因为我死了就不存在了,所以我怎么会害怕？
-
Simmias says we can't conclude that the soul is indestructible because we should not believe the subconclusion 4 invisible things can't be destroyed.
他说我们不能得出结论说,灵魂不朽或几乎不朽或其他什么,因为我们不该相信,4这个结论4,即无形的东西不可毁灭。
-
And then if 5 is true that the soul is really invisible, we are entitled to conclude 6 The soul can't be destroyed.
然后如果5正确,即灵魂确实无形，我们有资格得出6这个结论6,灵魂不会毁灭。
-
Well, if that's the right thing to say about the France case, then why not say the same thing about the near-death experience case?
如果关于法国的例子是对的,那为什么关于濒死体验,我们就不能得出相同的结论呢
应用推荐