Perhaps the argument should be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object, no machine could feel."

而应该是,我们不得不相信灵魂,因为所有物理对象,所有的机器都没有感觉

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Perhaps the argument shouldn't be, "We have to believe in souls because no mere physical object could reason."

也许论证不应该是,我们必须相信灵魂,因为所有的物理对象都不能推理

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

I think the smallpox vaccine we made now would probably be better, more effective, and safer than the vaccines we made in the '50s.

我相信若我们现在制造天花疫苗,应该会比五十年代的更有效更安全

耶鲁公开课 - 生物医学工程探索课程节选

He's really saying that this equity premium is enduring and we should believe it.

他会说这个股权溢价确实存在,我们应该相信这一结论

耶鲁公开课 - 金融市场课程节选

Well, should we believe this?

我们是否应该相信这个观点呢

耶鲁公开课 - 心理学导论课程节选

The question we want to turn to, then, is, "Which of these two views should we believe: the dualist position or the physicalist position?"

接下来,我们的问题是,这两种观点,我们到底应该相信哪一种,二元论还是物理主义

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Hold off again, for a few minutes at least, on the question, so what should we believe ? in the body view, the personality view?

等等，先抽几分钟，讨论一下这个问题，我们应该,相信什么？肉体论？人格论？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And the crucial question, presumably, is, "Should we believe in the existence of a soul?"

而最为关键的,也许是,我们应该相信灵魂是存在的吗

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Well, should we conclude, therefore, so nobody really believes that they're ever in dreamless sleep?

那么我们就应该得出结论，没有人真正相信,他们可以进入无梦的睡眠么？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

And it's because of that that I think we shouldn't be dismissive of the dualist when the dualist says, "We've got to believe in souls in order to explain it."

正因如此,我认为我们不应该轻视二元论者,当他们说,我们只有相信灵魂才能解释这些

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

Still, that doesn't mean that we should believe the argument for the existence of the soul from near-death experiences, because the question remains, "What's the best explanation of what's going on in near-death experiences?"

但是,这并不意味着,我们应该相信那些从濒死体验角度,来证明灵魂存在的论证,因为问题仍在,对于濒死体验的,最好解释是什么

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

My point here was only to say we shouldn't be so quick to think that we have to believe in the existence of a soul in order to explain our having free will.

我的观点不过就是说我们不应该这么草率地,认为我们不得不相信,灵魂的存在,从而解释我们有自由意志

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

should we conclude therefore, given that we've got the premise, "If you can't picture it or imagine it, then you can't believe in it," since I've just said, look, you can't imagine being dead, but that's not due to any failure of imagination, that's because there's nothing there to imagine or picture.

于是我们就应该基于这个前提，想象不了的东西就不能相信，得出结论吗“,我刚才已经说过，人不能想象自己的死亡，不是因为想象的失败，而是本来就没有东西可以想象。

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选

So I can't use thinking about the Williams cases as a method of deciding what do I really believe, the body view or the personality view?

因此我不能采用Williams的案例,来帮助我们判断我们应该相信哪种理论，肉体理论还是人格理论？

耶鲁公开课 - 死亡课程节选