But most importantly, I think, is to go back to the importance given to the individual in Hobbes' philosophy.
除去前面所述的观点,我们还应当给霍布斯哲学中的,个人主义予以足够的重视。
dU=dq+dw Well from the first law, du is equal to dq plus dw, and I wrote down everything I knew at the beginning here.
第一定律“,前面我们已经,看到了。
For example,I said this meal they have, it's called "the boss's dinner." We call it the Lord's Supper.
比如,我前面说他们聚餐,叫“老板请客“,我们现在称之为圣餐。
Let's try to do part of it in the head, so I can just write down the answer.
让我们先试试前面的一部分,我就直接写答案了
So this means we can actually calculate this for any molecule that we've drawn the Lewis structure for, because we actually do need to draw the Lewis structure before we know, for example, how many of each of these we have, or at least go through the rules.
这意味着我们可以将原来画过,路易斯结构的分子的形式电荷计算出来,因为我们其实在画出,路易斯结构之后才能知道,比如,这些量的值是多少,或者至少我们需要经过前面的那些步骤。
We can't stand against them anymore and when you start running, the only thing the guys who are left up front can do is run.
我们打不过他们了,而你开始逃跑,留在前面的人唯一能做的也是逃跑
But the story as it stands reiterates a motif that we've seen before: that of the threatened destruction of God's creation, or God's people by chaotic waters, and of divine salvation from that threat.
但是这段故事不断的重读我们前面见到过的一个主题:,上帝子民被汹涌的水所威胁,人们不断从那些威胁中的到拯救。
We saw this with the sock algorithm a moment ago.
我们前面看到了袜子算法。
Now, I want to ask a question that we're going to need to think about, the two of you sitting up front here, when I was asking you how you responded to it. Can we have a moral response to this novel?
现在,我想要问你们一个我们将要思考的问题,就你们俩吧,坐在前面的,当我问你们如何回应,我们可以对这部小说有一个道德反思吗?
From all this we can conclude several things.
从前面谈到的我们可以总结出几点
There is a kind of internal irony here, I think because Hobbes sometimes writes as if, as we've seen, as if human beings are nothing more than complex machines that mechanically obey the laws of attraction and repulsion.
但我想这儿似乎存在着一种讽刺,因为霍布斯笔下的人,似乎就只是一具复杂的机器,只知机械地遵循法律所允许和不允许的事,这点我们在前面已有所耳闻。
So we need to have a convention here, whether we're viewing this from the perspective of people behind them or people in front of them, let's view it from the perspective of the people in front of them.
我们需要达成一个共识,不论我们看他们的角度是,从他们后面,还是从他们前面,我们统一用他们前面角度
When we call init, it's going to create the instance, all right, just as we said before.
好,正如我们前面所受的,但是尤其是,它会去用self来引用这个实例。
That means we can also measure velocity slightly later and make the slightly later come as close to right now as we want.
那我们也可以测出稍微迟一点的速度,让那个速度接近我们前面测得的速度
But we can plug that in again just like we did before.
就像我们前面做的一样。
Sam All right. So, we'll move this up to the front in just a minute, but I'm going to explain how this experiment works and we'll do the calculation first before the excitement breaks out.
好的,这是她的女儿,被背带背她在胸前,这是Patti,Christie博士,好的,我们等会,会把它移到前面,但我要先解释下。
You might think of walking in here expecting Professor Hungerford on censorship and getting me instead. But this is a very important idea for Nabokov both as a way of treating predecessors and as a way of writing. And I want to show you that way of writing very early in the book on page 10 now. Let's take a look at that.
你们可能期待亨格福特教授走上讲台,取代我讲审查制度,但这对纳博科夫而言,是非常重要的对待前辈和写作的方法,接下来,我将向你们展示,他的写作风格,在这本书的很前面,第10页,我们一起看一下。
So the result is we can combine all of these as a single differential, and just like we've seen before, what that suggests is that we define another new quantity given by this expression.
结果就是我们能把所有的结果,整理成一个单一的微分,就像我们前面看到的一样,这说明我们可以利用这个式子,定义一个新的物理量。
If we did that, if we moved f minus 32 over to the left, that would give me a floating point answer because f is a float.
如果你那样做,如果我们把,放前面,那将会给我们一个浮点数答案,因为f是浮点数。
And the reason that we now on the second line have the equal sign is because this function GetString has what's called a return value.
我们之所以,在第二行代码GetString前面加上等号,是因为这个函数会带回一个,返回值。
应用推荐