-
Well, however we settle that issue, notice there's still one other assumption that all these positions still have in common.
不管我们如何解决这个问题，我们都会发现有一个假定,是这些观点都共有的。
-
Let's assume, for sake of argument, the thing I'm looking for is bigger than this. In that case, I'm going to throw away all of this, I'm going to hit that bottom line of that code.
让我们假定不是，假定要找的元素,比这个大，在这样的情况下，这些都擦掉，我要运行到代码的最后一行。
-
Back to our hypothetical, you know, our initial discussion of Flaming Hot Cheetos: by his definition that would not qualify as food.
再回过头来谈谈我们之前的假定,我们曾讨论过关于火焰辣奇多的问题,按照他的定义,奇多不能算作食物
-
If you assume that, you are not playing by the rule, we don't know what force it exerts.
如果你假定了,那你就犯规了,我们不知道它施加了多大的力
-
So we have to assume that the occasion for this poem is some kind of question posed by John Milton, Sr., a question like, "To what end am I supporting you, Son?
我们可以假定这个诗的起因是,老约翰弥尔顿问小弥尔顿，“我到底为什么要资助你，儿子？“
-
So, presumably, if we follow our rules so far only one of these should be correct.
那么，可以假定，如果我们按照之前的规则,应该只有一个是正确的。
-
And so we need to appeal to, we need to posit, the existence of, a soul.
所以我们需要借助他法,我们需要假定灵魂存在
-
I suppose we could specify the surroundings temperature.
假定我们能够,确定环境的温度。
-
We make the assumption that we need it workforce.
我们假定我们的生产力需要高文化素养。
-
The hypothesis is: the best lies are lies we tell ourselves.
我们假定：,最好的谎言是能够骗到我们自己的谎言。
-
I assume what Socrates means by that is though each individual will, each of us, embody all three features of soul, appetite, spirit, and reason, only one of these will be the dominate trait in each of us.
我假定苏格拉底是指,虽然每个个体，我们每一个人，都将体现灵魂,欲望，意志与理性的全部三种特质，而仅有其中一项,会主宰我们每一个人。
-
But, I've dropped that assumption and now I'm going on to assuming that they're taking account of their dependence on each other, taking account of their different expected returns, and taking account of their different covariances and variances; so that's what we've got.
不过我已经放弃了那个假定,我现在假定,我们需要考虑它们彼此间的相关性，它们有着不同期望收益，不同的协方差和方差;,这是我们所学到的。
-
Another way of saying that, stop me if this is wrong, but one way to say that is we've been assuming that politics is one dimensional, left/right and there might be other things involved: character or even among issues, even among political issues it could be more than one dimension.
换句话说就是,如果我说错了请纠正,换种说法就是,我们把政治假定为单一维度的,非左即右,然而它还涉及其他方面,比如性格问题,即使政治事务的处理也不是单一维度的
-
Now let's go and fill the molecular states for the putative He2.
现在我们要填充分子状态,对于假定的He2来说。
-
Just for sake of argument, we'll assume it's about there, and I do the same thing.
为了方便起见,我们假定就在这里，重复之前做的。
-
So, that's a more complete quantum mechanical picture of what is going on here.
对它，更完整的描述,如果我们,假定径向概率分布。
-
or nymphs and satyrs than you or I know and later urban poets - and Theocritus was an urban poet -later urban poets like Virgil or Milton knew even less than Theocritus, we have to assume.
的森林之神），忒奥克里托斯知道的不比你我或是后来的,都市诗人多--忒奥克里托斯就是个都市诗人,-后来的都市诗人像维吉尔和弥尔顿,我们得假定，对这些知道的就比忒奥克里托斯还少了。
-
Suppose we've got some sort of radioactive atom, which has a certain chance of decaying.
假定我们有某种放射性原子,它们以一定的几率衰变
-
Well I made up some answers too and let's just use these as hypothetical examples.
我也想了一些答案,我们仅把这些作为假定的判断标准
-
Of course, that's assuming we know the equation of state.
这意味着我们假定,我们知道其状态方程。
-
And the reason for positing these things is because we're clearly able to think about these ideas, and yet, we recognize that the ordinary physical world-- although things may participate in them to varying degrees-- we don't actually come across these objects or entities in the physical world.
我们假定这些的原因是,这样我们就能够清楚的,去思考这些理念,目前我们认识到在正常的现实世界中,尽管很多东西或多或少的参与其中,我们并不会在现实世界中,直接面对这些对象或者个体
-
For those of you who still do believe in the existence of souls I suppose you could take a great deal in discussions that follows as some form of large conditional or subjunctive if there were no souls then here's what we have to say.
如果你们有人,还是相信灵魂的存在,或者你可以从以下的讨论里,也学到一些东西,把讨论看成有条件性和假定性的,假设没有灵魂,然后就是我们要讨论的东西。
-
And what does that say? It says, let's assume I want to do k searches of a list. OK.
如果我们假定要在列表中做k次搜索,在线性的情况下，假定是一个未排序的情况。
-
So if the argument's going to be, "We need to posit the existence of a soul in order to explain creativity," Again, that just seems wrong.
所以如果这个论证要说,我们必须假定灵魂的存在,才能解释创造力,再一次,这看起来是错误的
-
Normally I couldn't do that Vdp because this term would have p dV plus V dp, but we've specified the pressure is constant, so the dp part is zero.
一般情况下我不能这么写,因为这一项会包含pdV和，但是我们已经假定压强为常数，所以包含dp的部分等于零。
-
I also want to assume for our present purposes that there's only pressure volume work going on, which is to say I want to put pdV p dV in here minus p dV for dw.
同时假定,对于我们目前的目的而言，只有压强做功这就是说,我要把这里的dw替换为负。
-
That will follow once we assume that no physical object has beliefs or desires.
这是我们假定,物理对象没有信念或欲望的必然结果
-
Suppose we do believe in incompatibilism and believe that we've got free will.
假定我们相信不相容论,并认为人有自由意志
-
So we have no reason to posit the existence of a soul."
所以,我们没有理由假定灵魂存在
-
To explain the fact that we've got free will, so the objection goes, we have to appeal to-- we have to posit--the existence of a soul, something non-physical, something more than purely physical.
要解释我们有自由意志这一事实,反驳者会说,我们不得不诉诸,或者假定灵魂存在,这里提到的灵魂是非物质并超出物质的东西
应用推荐