-
What do we make of these allusions to divine colleagues or subordinates in light of Kaufman's claims regarding biblical monotheism?
参照考夫曼的一神论主张，我们如何理解这些暗示？,他们的地位等同于，还是次于上帝？
-
"For we assert," he says, "nature does nothing in vain and man alone " among the animals has speech.
他说，“因为我们主张自然演变并不无道理,而人类独立于其它动物之外,是因为我们有辩论能力。
-
But instead for being hypocrites, that we talk about justice but we have detainees in Guantanamo who have no rights.
相反，大家认为我们伪善，我们口口声声主张正义,而被我们关押在关塔纳莫湾的犯人,没有一点权力。
-
So what this line of reasoning brings us to is the fundamental principle that underlies the libertarian case for rights.
这些推理把我们带回到,自由主义的权利主张,所隐含的基本原则。
-
In the first passage, the statement about language by criticism, that sign and meaning can never coincide, is what is precisely taken for granted in the kind of language we call "literary."
在第一段，关于语言的主张，用批判的方式，认为符号和意思永远不能相矛盾，正是这个主张,被人们认为是理所当然的，对于我们所说的文学语言来说“
-
Some fact about us that calls out for explanation, and the claim on the part of the dualists was, we couldn't explain it without appealing to a soul.
有些关于我们的事实需要解释,而二元论者的主张是,如果不诉诸灵魂,我们就无法解释这些
-
First you've got the mono and saturated oil that we discussed before.
首先它主张以不饱和脂肪摄入为主,我们前面已经讨论过不饱和脂肪的问题
-
It's one that we'll take up in greater detail, though, when we get to the book of Deuteronomy, where it is stressed to a greater degree than it is in Exodus, but for now, we can accept Levenson's claim that Sinai represents an intersection of law and love, because of the use of the suzerainty model.
这点占据了很细节的描述，当我们读到《申命记》,其中强调的程度比《出埃及记》要多得多，但是现在，我们只能接受Levenson的主张，那就是,西奈代表了律法与热爱的交叉点，因为用到了领主模式。
-
To question those beliefs would seem to exhibit a kind of lack of civic faith faith in our ruling opinions.
如果质疑这些信念,似乎是表现出缺乏公民信仰,对我们统治主张的信仰。
-
We're interested in hearing everybody on his or her own terms and letting those texts be.
我们感兴趣的是，听到每个人自己不同的主张,不论作品怎样。
-
One group of arguments for the existence of a soul says, "We need to posit a soul in order to explain something, whether it's something everyday or something supernatural."
主张灵魂存在的一方声称,我们必须假设灵魂存在,才能解释一些,司空见惯或是超自然的现象
-
You wrote: I grew up believing that ours was a country that try to stand for good in the world and that upheld the fundamental values that bind us together as a nation.
你写到：,在我的成长过程中，我一直都相信，“,我们的国家,在世界上是一个象征美好的国家,我们主张基本的价值观,这些价值将我们凝结成一个民族。
-
We talk about equality t give other nations voice of what happened to them.
我们主张平等,却不让其他国家清楚自己的处境，but，we，don’
-
re seen as having betrayed our principles, re seen as no longer standing for the things that Americans think we stand for, for liberty and democracy and justice.
大家认为我们背叛了我们的原则，We’,大家认为我们，We’,不再坚持我们的主张，不再主张自由，民主和正义。
-
s not what we stand for.
这不是我们主张的，It’
-
That we share not just the capacity for language in the way a linguist might assert, but that we share a certain common moral language.
我们不只共享语言能力,如同语言学家所主张，更共享,一种特定的共同道德语言。
-
In other words, we can't use genre either as a blanket term; one of the most influential people in persuading us that there's no such thing as literature, legal texts, theological texts, philosophical texts, or scientific texts.
话句话说，我们不能将体裁用做一个概括性称呼;,主张没有文学，法律文本,哲学文本，或是科学文本中，最具影响的人物之一。
应用推荐