ReadFloat We'll look at it in a second. Let me sort of set the stage up for this -- suppose I want to input -- I'm sorry I want you as a user to input a floating point number.
名字叫,我们来看一会,我先来设置下情景-,假设我想输入,抱歉,我希望你们作为用户来输入一个浮点数。
Now I want to show you that this comes necessarily from an energetic standpoint.
现在我想展示给你们的是,从能量的观点来看这是很自然的是。
That's the crucial premise, and what I want to say is, as far as I can see there's no good reason to believe number two.
那就是最关键的前提,并且我想要说的是,依我来看,目前,并没有很好的理由来相信前提二
You guys probably know that too from your days at the daycare, but I want to derive the formula and put it up, then we'll see how to use it.
你们可能从幼儿园起就已经知道这个式子了,但是我想重新推导一遍,再来看如何进行运用
Often a good thing to start with is to put the lowest ionization energy atom in the middle, and if you don't have charge separation then go with that structure, but if you do find you have a lot of separation, such as the case in negative 2, positive 2, and minus 1, then you want to say wait a second, this is really bad in terms of formal charge, let me go ahead and see what other options I have here.
通常一开始把电离能最低的原子,放在中心位置就很好了,如果你发现电荷没有分开,那么这个结构就没问题了,但是如果你发现有很多分开的电荷,比如这种情况,有负二,正二和负一,那么你会想要说等一下,从形式电荷来看这很不好,让我去看看其它可能的选择。
More position vectors? I want to look at that.
例如其它的位矢,我想来看一下
So attempts to dismiss the appeal to near- death experiences on what we might call philosophical grounds-- this would be the bad notion of philosophy-- on philosophical grounds, I think that's got to be misguided.
因此想要在哲学基础上,驳回这种诉诸濒死体验,这可不是一个好的哲学观,从哲学基础上来看,我想那是不明智的
应用推荐