-
Right? That would be an entirely different matter, wouldn't it, because you would have absolutely no idea whether the question was rhetorical or grammatical, right?
对吧，那将会是一个完全不同的情况，难道不是吗，因为你就会完全不知道,这个问句是修辞型的还是语法型的，对吧？
-
Here at least. In other universities, it might be different.
至少我们学校的情况是这样。其他的学校可能会不同。
-
for instance, for the thermos with the coffee in if you place the boundary in the inside wall of the glass or the outside wall of the glass and the inside of the thermos, that makes a difference; different heat capacity, etcetera.
比如说，对于装咖啡的热水瓶来说,你把边界设置在瓶胆的内壁上,或者设置在瓶胆外壁上,或设在热水瓶里面，情况都是不一样的;,有不同的热容等等。
-
But what's new is we can now in different ways see the direct effects of mental life.
但最新的情况是,我们现在可以从不同的角度出发,探究心理活动所带来的直接影响
-
It's not that we are not enlightened, we just had a different history.
并非是我们不开化，只是我们的历史情况不同。
-
We're going to ask, "What's the needle showing at different times?"
我们想要知道,"不同情况下指针的读数是多少"
-
Natural right is mutable because different circumstances will require different kinds of decisions. So does this mean then that for Aristotle there are no universally valid ? standards of justice or right?
自然权利是易变的，因为不同的情况,将需要不同种的决策,这是否就意谓着亚里士多德,认为没有寰宇合法的,正义与权利标准？
-
We get a check for the Cheetos as well, but only because we're trained to believe that one tastes good and the other one doesn't, because in different cultures it would be the reverse.
我们还是选奇多作为食品,但选择的原因仅在于,所受的教育,告诉我们它好吃,而蟑螂不好吃,在不同的文化中情况可能是相反的
-
z So the main idea here is z effective is not z, so don't try to plug one in for the other, they're absolutely different quantities in any case when we're not talking about a 1 electron atom.
所以这里主要的观点是有效的z不同于，所以不要尝试将一个插入到另一个，当我们不在讨论1个电子的原子时,它们在任何情况下是绝对不同的量子数。
-
And by worst case we mean different things.
而这些情况是由不同的因素造成的。
-
Okay, 'a socially acceptable thing to be eating,' which of course will change from culture to culture even within a country, so that's very true.
好的 "社会认可的可食用的东西",当然这是因文化而异的,即使在一个国家里也是不同的,这种情况是很常见的
应用推荐