But that raises a third philosophical question: What is the moral work that consent does?
但这样又引发了第三个哲学问题:,征得同意有何道德作用?
Why does an act of consent make such a moral difference, that an act that would be wrong taking a life without consent, is morally permissible with consent?
为什么征得了同意,就能在道德上如此不同呢,没有征得同意就杀人,在道德上是不允许的,征得同意就是允许的吗?
I want to hear now, finally, from those of you who think even with consent, even with a lottery, even with a final murmur of consent by Parker, at the very last moment, it would still be wrong.
我现在想听听,是否有人认为,即便是征得了同意,即便是有了抽签,即便派克最终还是答应了,杀死派克依然还是错误的。
应用推荐